did not provide

USAGE SUMMARY

"did not provide" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express the idea that someone failed to supply something that was requested or expected. For example, "The company did not provide the proper safety equipment to its employees."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

He did not provide details.

The New York Times

It did not provide specifics.

The New York Times

She did not provide specifics.

The New York Times

The letter did not provide further details.

The New York Times

It did not provide a cause.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Khaled did not provide details.

The New York Times

They did not provide any other details.

The New York Times

The federal authorities did not provide them.

The New York Times - Sports

But he did not provide them.

The New York Times

She did not provide further details.

The New York Times - Sports

Officials did not provide additional details.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider stronger verbs like 'withheld', 'omitted', or 'refused' if you want to emphasize intention or a deliberate choice to not provide something. This can add nuance to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "did not provide" when a more direct term like "denied" or "refused" is more appropriate. "Did not provide" implies a lack of provision, while "denied" or "refused" indicates an active choice to withhold something.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not provide" functions as a negative transitive verb phrase, indicating the absence of an action or supply. It's commonly used to describe a failure to offer something expected. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and frequent usage across numerous sources.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "did not provide" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate a lack of supply, information, or action. Ludwig AI validates its usage across various contexts, predominantly in news and media, scientific, and formal business settings. When writing, be mindful of the implication you wish to convey; if intent is important, stronger verbs such as "refused" may be appropriate. By understanding its function, purpose, and potential alternatives, you can effectively incorporate "did not provide" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not furnish

A more formal synonym, emphasizing a lack of supply or provision.

failed to supply

Emphasizes the failure to furnish something that was needed or expected.

omitted to give

Highlights the act of leaving something out or not offering it.

refrained from offering

Indicates a deliberate choice not to present or give something.

neglected to furnish

Suggests a lack of attention or care in providing something required.

withheld from giving

Implies a deliberate act of keeping something back or not providing it.

lacked in providing

Focuses on the deficiency or absence of something that should have been given.

was deficient in supplying

Highlights a shortcoming or inadequacy in the act of providing.

stopped short of providing

Suggests that something was partially given but not fully completed.

fell short of supplying

Similar to 'stopped short', implying that the providing wasn't complete.

FAQs

What's a simpler way to say "did not provide"?

Alternatives include "failed to give", "omitted to give", or "did not furnish", depending on the context and desired level of formality.

Is it better to use "did not provide" or "failed to provide"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "failed to provide" often implies a stronger sense of responsibility or expectation than "did not provide". The best choice depends on the specific context.

How can I use "did not provide" in a sentence?

You can use "did not provide" to indicate a lack of supply, information, or assistance. For example, "The instructions did not provide enough detail", or "The company did not provide adequate safety measures".

What's the difference between "did not provide" and "refused to provide"?

"Did not provide" suggests a lack of supply or a failure to give something, while "refused to provide" indicates a deliberate choice to withhold something. "Refused" implies intent, while "did not provide" may simply indicate a lack of action.