did not encompass

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not encompass" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was not included or covered within a certain scope or range. Example: "The study did not encompass all the variables that could affect the outcome."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"The old system did not encompass questions about financial stability.

The New York Times

Results were considered statistically significant if the 95% CI did not encompass 1.0.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

After all, the millennium development goals did not encompass access to modern energy services.

The Guardian

But the report did not encompass another growth area: the gray market, where legally marketed weapons slip into unintended hands.

The New York Times

Id. at 7. Intervenors motioned to terminate the enforcement proceeding, contending that the Consent Order did not encompass the accused conduct.

Harvard University

In October last year, the attorney general, Jeff Sessions, issued a memo saying that the federal law against workplace discrimination did not encompass transgender workers.

The Guardian

It is noteworthy that the D.C.I.'s comments were limited to the C.I.A. and did not encompass the resources of other agencies within the intelligence community.

The New York Times

The now-defunct demographics unit did not encompass the sum of the NYPD surveillance tactics that activists and community members find far more distressing, either.

The Guardian

Accordingly, we must assume that the District Court erred in ruling that the indictment did not encompass the numbers allegation because of its failure to cite Mass.Gen.Laws Ann., ch.

Cornell University

However, our sample did not encompass stage IV cancer cases and our main results were largely unchanged in the sensitivity analyses addressing reverse causation, thus lowering the likelihood of this issue.

Nature

American officials say that recent overtures from the Obama administration toward Iran — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton last week proposed a conference on Afghanistan that would include Iran — did not encompass any use of Iranian roads.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "did not encompass", ensure the context clearly defines what is being excluded and the scope it falls outside of. This helps avoid ambiguity and strengthens the statement's clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "did not encompass" without specifying what should have been included. Simply stating something wasn't encompassed can leave readers wondering what the expected scope was. Always provide context to make the exclusion meaningful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not encompass" functions as a negative transitive verb phrase. It indicates that a particular subject failed to include, cover, or contain something within its scope. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Unknown

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "did not encompass" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that specifies what is excluded from a defined scope. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is effective in various contexts, notably science, news, and academia. While alternative phrases like "did not include" and "did not cover" exist, "did not encompass" often provides a more precise and formal tone. When employing this phrase, ensure the context clearly indicates what falls outside the defined parameters to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. Overall, "did not encompass" serves as a valuable tool for expressing limitations and exclusions with precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not include

This alternative is a more direct synonym, focusing on the simple act of not containing something.

did not cover

This alternative implies a lack of thoroughness or completeness in addressing a topic or area.

did not comprise

This alternative is a more formal synonym, suggesting that something was not part of a whole.

did not contain

This alternative emphasizes the absence of something within a specific container or set.

did not incorporate

This alternative highlights the failure to integrate or include something as part of a larger system or structure.

fell outside the scope of

This alternative specifies that something was beyond the defined limits or boundaries.

was not limited to

This alternative indicates that something exceeded a certain range or definition.

did not extend to

This alternative suggests that something's reach or influence did not cover a specific area or aspect.

did not involve

This alternative focuses on the absence of participation or inclusion in an activity or process.

did not address

This alternative signifies a failure to deal with or discuss a particular issue or concern.

FAQs

How can I use "did not encompass" in a sentence?

You can use "did not encompass" to indicate that something was not included or covered within a particular scope. For example, "The study "did not encompass" all the variables that could affect the outcome."

What's a simpler alternative to "did not encompass"?

Simpler alternatives include phrases like "did not include", "did not cover", or "did not contain". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "did not encompass" formal or informal?

"Did not encompass" leans toward the formal side but is suitable for various contexts, including academic, professional, and news-related writing. However, in very informal settings, you might prefer a simpler alternative like "didn't include".

What's the difference between "did not encompass" and "did not address"?

"Did not encompass" means something wasn't included or within a certain scope, while "did not address" implies a failure to deal with or discuss a particular issue. The former focuses on inclusion, the latter on engagement.