deviating from chance levels

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "deviating from chance levels" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to statistics, research, or experiments where results are compared to random chance outcomes. Example: "The results of the study showed a significant effect, with participants deviating from chance levels in their responses."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Surprisingly, the birds' performance in the object choice task hardly deviated from chance level at all, although previous studies have clearly demonstrated the effects of touching an object on the choice decisions of juvenile ravens and Carrion crows via local enhancement (Mikolasch et al., 2011; Schloegl et al., 2008).

Behavioural Processes

Therefore we performed binomial tests on the performances of each bird with the different experimenters to test if the birds' performance deviated from a chance level of 50% or 0.5, respectively.

Behavioural Processes

Similarly, markers that become significant only when deviating from characterized background levels can also be analyzed.

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

The mean expression levels in BPD deviated from the CON levels for β2S1 and β2S2, but not for β2S and β2L.

Plosone

Obviously, deviating from the optimal expenditure level in any way would reduce the firm's returns.

Harvard Business Review

We first confirmed that the shams did not deviate from a chance value of 50% anticlockwise turns (t = −0.784, P = 0.455) and, as there is no lesion side in these animals, they were excluded from further analysis.

European Journal of Neuroscience

Such result is consistent with the observation that calculated kurtosis for the frequency distribution increased from an estimate of −0.513 to 1.211 when moving from the primary to secondary dataset, an indication that the selected datasets deviated significantly from chance.

Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics

No markers were flagged as deviating from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at the P<0.05 level.

Plosone

Those deviating from Mendelian 1 : 1 segregation at a 1% significance level were discarded.

DNA Research

Hence, in the null hypothesis, the mean proportion looking at either would be deviated from 0.5 (i.e. chance level) due to the unknown factor causing a preference to either of asymmetric arrangement of flashes.

Plosone

The experiment demonstrated that the RNAIII level in the clpX mutant does not deviate from the wild-type levels.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing experimental results, use "deviating from chance levels" to clearly indicate that the outcomes are statistically significant and not due to random variation. This phrase is especially useful in scientific reports and academic papers.

Common error

Avoid using "deviating from chance levels" loosely without proper statistical validation. Ensure that the deviation is indeed statistically significant and not merely a random fluctuation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "deviating from chance levels" primarily functions as a descriptor in scientific and statistical contexts. Ludwig indicates that it is a correct and usable phrase to express results that are statistically significant. It modifies nouns (results, findings) to highlight the non-random nature of the data.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

71%

News & Media

21%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "deviating from chance levels" is a grammatically correct and statistically meaningful descriptor commonly found in scientific and academic contexts. Ludwig's AI analysis confirms its proper usage for indicating results that are statistically significant and not due to random variation. While not extremely common, its use is crucial in research reports and scientific papers to precisely convey the non-random nature of observed outcomes. Related phrases include "differing from expected probabilities" and "straying from statistical expectation". When using this phrase, ensure proper statistical validation to avoid misinterpretations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

diverging significantly from randomness

This clarifies how the results are strongly distinct to what would be expected by chance alone.

deviating substantially from chance

This enhances the degree to which results diverged from what would be anticipated purely by chance.

differing from expected probabilities

This alternative emphasizes the difference between observed outcomes and predicted probabilities.

varying considerably from randomness

Focuses on how outcomes show substantial changes from a state of randomness.

varying from random distribution

This phrase highlights the departure from a completely random arrangement of data.

differing significantly from the norm

Focuses on how outcomes differ in a notably significant way from what is accepted.

straying from statistical expectation

This alternative underscores that the results are not in line with what statistical models would predict.

diverging from baseline randomness

This phrase suggests a movement away from a foundational level of randomness.

departing from hypothetical randomness

This alternative stresses that actual observations move away from an imaginary scenario of randomness.

exceeding likelihood thresholds

This emphasizes the degree to which results surpasses a certain level of probability.

FAQs

What does it mean for results to deviate from chance levels?

When results "deviating from chance levels", it indicates that the observed outcomes are unlikely to have occurred randomly and suggest a significant effect or relationship is present.

How do you determine if something is "deviating from chance levels"?

Statistical tests, such as t-tests or chi-squared tests, are used to calculate the probability (p-value) that the observed results occurred by chance. If the p-value is below a predetermined significance level (e.g., 0.05), the results are considered to be "deviating from chance levels".

What are some alternative ways to say "deviating from chance levels"?

Alternatives include "differing significantly from randomness", "straying from statistical expectation", or "varying from random distribution", depending on the specific context.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use the phrase "deviating from chance levels"?

The phrase is suitable in scientific research, statistical analysis, and any situation where you need to describe results that are statistically significant and not likely due to random variation, such as in experimental reports or academic publications.