cross-referenced with

USAGE SUMMARY

"cross-referenced with" is correct and can be used in written English.
You would use it when referring to something that has been verified or checked against something else for accuracy. For example, "The sources in this article have been cross-referenced with other published sources."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

It's a database of recipes, cross-referenced with various allergies.

The Guardian - Tech

(Names are cross-referenced with addresses, dates of birth and other data).

The Economist

Those data points were cross-referenced with the votes cast for Mr. Obama in various polling precincts.

The New York Times

Data was subsequently cross-referenced with our institution's patient records.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

All of which can then be cross-referenced with a politician's voting record.

TechCrunch

The information gathered via scan is uploaded and cross-referenced with the company's inventory software.

TechCrunch

The NYT added the images were then cross-referenced with other databases.

BBC

The lists can be sliced and cross-referenced with other information to make new lists.

Forbes

This was cross-referenced with information from the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) database.

Gynecological Surgery

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

This was cross referenced with tweets mentioning the songs to ensure that the data was accurate.

The Guardian - Music

Information may be cross referenced with other component SARs data, or verified through systems of records within an individual component.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "cross-referenced with", ensure that both the original data and the reference source are clearly identified to maintain transparency and allow for verification.

Common error

Avoid stating that data was "cross-referenced with" another source without specifying the purpose or findings of the comparison. Provide context on what the cross-referencing revealed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross-referenced with" functions as a past participle phrase, often used as part of a passive construction. It indicates that one set of data or information has been checked against another for verification purposes. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is grammatically sound and common.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

43%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cross-referenced with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate that information has been checked against another source for accuracy. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is valid for use in written English. It is most commonly found in scientific and news-related contexts and maintains a neutral to formal register. When using the phrase, it's important to identify both the original data and the reference source for transparency. While alternatives like "checked against" or "verified with" exist, "cross-referenced with" specifically implies a systematic process of ensuring data reliability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

checked against

Emphasizes verification by comparing with a known standard or source.

verified with

Highlights the confirmation of accuracy through comparison.

compared to

Focuses on identifying similarities and differences through a direct comparison.

validated against

Stresses the establishment of the soundness or correctness of something using a reference.

correlated with

Suggests a mutual relationship or connection between two or more things.

aligned with

Indicates that something is in agreement or conformity with something else.

substantiated by

Implies providing evidence to support the truth or validity of something.

authenticated by

Highlights the process of proving that something is genuine.

confirmed with

Underscores the action of establishing the truth or correctness of something.

compared alongside

Implies a side-by-side comparison for thorough evaluation.

FAQs

How is "cross-referenced with" used in a sentence?

You can use "cross-referenced with" to indicate that information from one source has been checked against another for accuracy. For example, "The patient data was "cross-referenced with" hospital records".

What can I say instead of "cross-referenced with"?

Alternatives to "cross-referenced with" include "checked against", "verified with", or "compared to", depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "cross-referenced with" or "cross-reference with"?

"Cross-referenced with" is the correct past participle form to use when describing an action that has been completed. "Cross-reference with" is the infinitive form.

What's the difference between "cross-referenced with" and "compared with"?

"Cross-referenced with" implies a systematic check for accuracy against another source, while "compared with" suggests a broader assessment of similarities and differences.