Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

cross checked with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"cross checked with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the process of verifying information by comparing it with a separate source. For example, "We cross checked the patient's medical history with the records in the hospital database."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Comparability of results is assured by calibrated metrology tools which are cross checked with ASML's flying circus.

The collected sites were cross checked with other databases such as PDB and PhosPhAt.

The data are cross checked with other hospital data for completeness and accuracy.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

The document review was cross-checked with findings from interviews and observation of deliberations.

Date and cause of death was cross-checked with information from clinical notes where possible.

Results from the imputed data set will be cross-checked with the non-imputed data set.

These compiled data were validated and cross-checked with each set to ensure it is representative of those scenarios considered.

The data were independently cross-checked with the original papers using a standard quality control procedure.

This criterion is cross-checked with an elastic strain model.

These published data were cross-checked with the contour graphs.

These predictions were cross-checked with spore inactivation measurements.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "cross checked with", ensure that both the original data and the source used for checking are clearly identified to maintain transparency and allow for independent verification.

Common error

While "cross checked with" is suitable for formal and technical writing, avoid using it excessively in informal contexts. Simpler alternatives like "checked with" or "compared with" may be more appropriate.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross checked with" functions as a compound verb indicating an action performed on data or information. It signifies a process of verification through comparison with another source to ensure accuracy and reliability. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

12%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "cross checked with" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression, particularly within scientific, news, and formal business domains. It signifies a method of verifying data by comparing it against another source to ensure accuracy. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. While "cross checked with" effectively conveys a thorough verification process, be mindful of the context and choose simpler alternatives like "checked with" or "compared with" in less formal settings. This practice helps maintain clarity and prevents overuse of the phrase, ensuring effective communication.

FAQs

How can I use "cross checked with" in a sentence?

Use "cross checked with" to indicate that information has been verified against another source. For example, "The data was "cross checked with" the original records to ensure accuracy."

What are some alternatives to "cross checked with"?

You can use alternatives like "verified against", "validated with", or "confirmed by" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "cross checked with" or "checked with"?

"Cross checked with" emphasizes a more thorough or formal verification process, implying comparison against another source. "Checked with" is a simpler, more general term. The better choice depends on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

What does "cross checked with" imply about the verification process?

It implies that a piece of information wasn't just verified, but that it was compared against an independent source to ensure accuracy and consistency. This often suggests a more rigorous verification process than a simple check.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: