Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
cross checked with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"cross checked with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the process of verifying information by comparing it with a separate source. For example, "We cross checked the patient's medical history with the records in the hospital database."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
3 human-written examples
Comparability of results is assured by calibrated metrology tools which are cross checked with ASML's flying circus.
Science
The collected sites were cross checked with other databases such as PDB and PhosPhAt.
The data are cross checked with other hospital data for completeness and accuracy.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
The document review was cross-checked with findings from interviews and observation of deliberations.
Date and cause of death was cross-checked with information from clinical notes where possible.
Science
Results from the imputed data set will be cross-checked with the non-imputed data set.
Science
These compiled data were validated and cross-checked with each set to ensure it is representative of those scenarios considered.
The data were independently cross-checked with the original papers using a standard quality control procedure.
Science
This criterion is cross-checked with an elastic strain model.
These published data were cross-checked with the contour graphs.
Science
These predictions were cross-checked with spore inactivation measurements.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "cross checked with", ensure that both the original data and the source used for checking are clearly identified to maintain transparency and allow for independent verification.
Common error
While "cross checked with" is suitable for formal and technical writing, avoid using it excessively in informal contexts. Simpler alternatives like "checked with" or "compared with" may be more appropriate.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "cross checked with" functions as a compound verb indicating an action performed on data or information. It signifies a process of verification through comparison with another source to ensure accuracy and reliability. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.
Frequent in
Science
75%
News & Media
12%
Formal & Business
13%
Less common in
Social Media
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "cross checked with" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression, particularly within scientific, news, and formal business domains. It signifies a method of verifying data by comparing it against another source to ensure accuracy. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. While "cross checked with" effectively conveys a thorough verification process, be mindful of the context and choose simpler alternatives like "checked with" or "compared with" in less formal settings. This practice helps maintain clarity and prevents overuse of the phrase, ensuring effective communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
checked against
A direct synonym, but emphasizes the action of checking.
verified against
Emphasizes the act of confirming accuracy by comparing against a known standard or source.
validated with
Focuses on establishing the soundness or legitimacy of something using another source.
confirmed by
Highlights that something has been proven true by an external source.
compared with
Stresses the act of examining similarities and differences with another source.
corroborated by
Indicates that supporting evidence has been provided by another source.
authenticated against
Focuses on proving the genuineness of something using another source.
reconciled with
Suggests resolving discrepancies by comparing with another source.
verified in relation to
More formal; indicates checking something in connection to something else.
compared in conjunction with
Highlights that the action of comparing is done together with something else
FAQs
How can I use "cross checked with" in a sentence?
Use "cross checked with" to indicate that information has been verified against another source. For example, "The data was "cross checked with" the original records to ensure accuracy."
What are some alternatives to "cross checked with"?
You can use alternatives like "verified against", "validated with", or "confirmed by" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to say "cross checked with" or "checked with"?
"Cross checked with" emphasizes a more thorough or formal verification process, implying comparison against another source. "Checked with" is a simpler, more general term. The better choice depends on the desired level of formality and emphasis.
What does "cross checked with" imply about the verification process?
It implies that a piece of information wasn't just verified, but that it was compared against an independent source to ensure accuracy and consistency. This often suggests a more rigorous verification process than a simple check.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested