validated with

USAGE SUMMARY

"validated with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to express a comparison or assure the correctness of something. For example: "His findings were validated with a series of experiments."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This software has been validated with prototypes.

Robotics and Biomimetics

These solutions validated with NSGA-II.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

This model is validated with diagnostic checking.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The simulations are validated with experimental data.

Applied Thermal Engineering

Developed models are validated with experimental data.

International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives

The simulated results are validated with experiments.

Energy and Buildings

The effect is validated with experimental testing.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The model is validated with numerical calculations.

Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics

The concept has been validated with experiments.

Solar Energy

It was validated with experimental data.

Chemical Engineering Science

The model is validated with experimental data.

Chemical Engineering Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In academic writing, be specific about the validation process and results when using "validated with" to enhance the rigor of your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "validated with" without specifying the type of validation or the data used. For example, saying 'the theory was validated' is vague. Instead, specify: 'the theory was "validated with" experimental data'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "validated with" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb or noun, indicating the means by which something has been confirmed or supported. Ludwig AI provides numerous examples demonstrating its use in various scientific and academic contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

85%

News & Media

8%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "validated with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase, predominantly in formal and scientific contexts. It serves to substantiate claims by specifying the method or data used for confirmation. As Ludwig AI's analysis demonstrates, it's crucial to clearly articulate the validation method to avoid vagueness. While alternatives like "confirmed by" or "verified through" exist, "validated with" excels in highlighting the specific validation instrument. Its high source quality and expert rating underscore its reliability in establishing credibility in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

confirmed by means of

This alternative specifies the means by which the validation was achieved, adding clarity.

verified through

Focuses on the verification aspect, suggesting a formal confirmation process.

substantiated by

Implies a strong level of evidence supporting the validation.

corroborated using

Highlights the use of corroborating evidence to validate.

supported by

Indicates that the data or findings lend support to the validation.

authenticated via

Suggests a process of proving the genuineness of something.

demonstrated with

Emphasizes the act of showing or proving something with evidence.

ascertained with

Highlights the process of finding something out for certain.

legitimated with

Indicates that something has been made legitimate through a process.

certified with

Focuses on the certification aspect, suggesting a formal attestation.

FAQs

How can I use "validated with" in a sentence?

You can use "validated with" to indicate that a claim, model, or result has been confirmed or supported by a particular method or data. For example, 'The model was "validated with" experimental data'.

What are some alternatives to "validated with"?

Alternatives include "confirmed by means of", "verified through", or "substantiated by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "validated by" or "validated with"?

Both "validated by" and "validated with" are grammatically correct, but "validated with" is often used to specify the method or data used in the validation process. "Validated by" is more general.

What does it mean when something is "validated with" experimental results?

It means that the claim, model, or result has been confirmed or supported using data obtained from experiments, indicating a level of reliability and accuracy.