criticized with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "criticized with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to describe a situation in which someone expresses disapproval of someone else utilizing language that is strong or unkind. For example: "The referee was criticized with harsh language after making an unpopular call."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

This album and the band's change in image/musical direction (nu metal/alternative metal) was highly criticized, with critics and fans alike accusing the band of "selling out".

Wikipedia

("The conventional is uncritically enjoyed, while the truly new is criticized with aversion").

The New York Times

In 2001, Thai's fleet was criticized — with an off-color invective — by the country's own prime minister.

The New York Times - Travel

While marketing to children has been criticized with obesity related lawsuits, product tie-ins are a complicated issue for parents.

The New York Times

When the Bush administration issued an update last week on federal climate research, it was criticized with equal vigor by environmentalists and by industry-backed groups.

The New York Times - Science

Still, the proposal was widely criticized, with politicians here saying that it would flout international law and alter NATO's mission in Afghanistan.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

Republican candidates inevitably criticize, with some accuracy, Democratic proposals on health care or taxes as being closer to the way things are done in Europe.

The New Yorker

Cindy once described her father to Peter Schjeldahl as a "creep," an insensitive and self-absorbed man who "would criticize with hate".

The New Yorker

She has an army of new backers, but some of them say she can undermine her message when she criticizes with an overly broad brush or resorts to personal attacks.

The New York Times

How difficult to criticize with aplomb to nurture new and talented directors.

Vice

It's easy to criticize with hindsight and I don't mean to criticize the U.S. administration then for failing to foresee what might happen 20 years later.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "criticized with", ensure that the 'with' is followed by a noun or noun phrase that specifies the means or method of criticism, such as "criticized with harsh words" or "criticized with detailed analysis".

Common error

Avoid using "criticized with" when you intend to convey simple disapproval without specifying the method. In such cases, consider using alternatives like "criticized for" or "criticized because of" to clarify the reason for criticism rather than the means.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "criticized with" functions as a verb phrase where 'criticized' is the main verb in the past tense, and 'with' acts as a preposition linking the verb to the method or instrument used in the criticism. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

32%

Wiki

16%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Academia

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "criticized with" is a grammatically sound phrase used to express disapproval, while specifically highlighting the method or instrument employed in the criticism. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correct and usable across diverse writing styles. While generally neutral, its impact varies with context. For alternatives, consider phrases such as "attacked with" or "rebuked using" if seeking a similar but differently nuanced expression. Remember, use "criticized with" when the how of the criticism is as important as the criticism itself.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

denounced using

Replaces "criticized" with "denounced" which conveys a stronger sense of public condemnation.

attacked with

Substitutes "criticized" for "attacked" emphasizing a more aggressive form of disapproval.

rebuked with

Replaces "criticized" with "rebuked", indicating a sharp disapproval or reprimand.

berated with

Substitutes "criticized" with "berated", suggesting a prolonged and vehement criticism.

lambasted using

Replaces "criticized" with "lambasted" indicating harsh verbal attack or censure.

condemned with

Substitutes "criticized" with "condemned", highlighting a strong disapproval and judgment.

expressed disapproval using

More formal than "criticized with" offering a wider overview of disapproval expressed by someone.

voiced concerns with

Substitutes "criticized" with "voiced concerns", softening the phrase to express worry rather than strict disapproval.

challenged using

Changes "criticized" to "challenged" indicating that the criticism takes the form of a dispute or questioning.

disagreed with through

Replaces "criticized" with "disagreed", lessening the phrase to simple disagreement, but stating that the disagreement came through a verbal exchange.

FAQs

How can I use "criticized with" in a sentence?

Use "criticized with" to indicate the method or instrument used in expressing criticism. For example, "The policy was "criticized with" detailed economic data" shows the means of criticism.

What are some alternatives to "criticized with"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include: "attacked with", "rebuked with", or "expressed disapproval using". The best choice depends on the specific shade of meaning you want to convey.

Is it always appropriate to use "criticized with"?

While grammatically correct, "criticized with" is most effective when you want to emphasize how the criticism was delivered. If the 'how' isn't important, simpler phrases like "criticized for" or "criticized because of" may be more suitable.

What's the difference between "criticized with" and "criticized for"?

"Criticized with" focuses on the tool or method used to criticize, whereas "criticized for" specifies the reason for the criticism. For example, "criticized with data" versus "criticized for inaccuracy".