Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
criticized for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"criticized for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to express disapproval or dissatisfaction for someone or something. For example: The organization was heavily criticized for its handling of the situation.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
He was roundly criticized for not returning.
News & Media
was criticized for legally improper intervention.
News & Media
Later they were criticized for this.
News & Media
He was widely criticized for both actions.
News & Media
Wellington has sometimes been criticized for inconsistency.
Encyclopedias
We get criticized for having flavor".
News & Media
He should not be criticized for that".
News & Media
Tells how Koch was criticized for this.
News & Media
Was I criticized for this portrayal?
Academia
Were you criticized for this portrayal?
Academia
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
China Criticized For Viagra Patent Decision.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "criticized for", clearly state the reason for the criticism to avoid ambiguity. For instance, instead of saying "He was criticized", specify "He was criticized for his handling of the situation".
Common error
Avoid using "criticized for" without providing context or specifics. Vague statements weaken your argument. Instead of saying "The policy was criticized for being ineffective", specify "The policy was criticized for failing to address key issues such as rising costs and lack of accessibility".
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "criticized for" functions as a verb phrase indicating disapproval or negative judgment directed at someone or something due to a specific action, behavior, or attribute. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a grammatically sound way to express censure.
Frequent in
News & Media
62%
Academia
17%
Science
12%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
3%
Wiki
3%
Formal & Business
3%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "criticized for" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to express disapproval or censure. According to Ludwig AI, it's perfectly acceptable in written English. This phrase appears most frequently in News & Media, Academia, and Scientific contexts, indicating its broad applicability across various registers. To use it effectively, clearly state the reason for the criticism to avoid ambiguity. Avoid overgeneralization by providing specific details about why something is being criticized. Related phrases include "reprimanded for", "blamed for", and "faulted for", each with slightly different nuances. When writing with criticized for, remember that clarity and specificity are key for effective communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
reprimanded for
This alternative implies a formal rebuke, often from an authority figure.
chastised for
This suggests a scolding, often with the intent to correct behavior.
condemned for
This implies strong disapproval and moral judgment.
censured for
This suggests formal disapproval, often by a governing body or organization.
blamed for
This focuses on assigning responsibility for a fault or negative outcome.
faulted for
This emphasizes finding errors or weaknesses in someone's actions or work.
taken to task for
This suggests being challenged or confronted about a mistake or wrongdoing.
reproached for
This implies expressing disappointment or disapproval.
admonished for
This suggests a gentle but firm warning or scolding.
held accountable for
This focuses on making someone responsible for their actions and their consequences.
FAQs
How can I use "criticized for" in a sentence?
The phrase "criticized for" is used to indicate that someone or something has received negative feedback or disapproval for a specific reason. For example, "The company was criticized for its environmental practices".
What are some alternatives to using "criticized for"?
You can use alternatives like "reprimanded for", "blamed for", or "faulted for" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "criticized about" instead of "criticized for"?
No, the correct preposition to use with "criticized" in this context is "for". Saying "criticized about" is grammatically incorrect. It's correct to say "He was criticized for his decision", not "He was criticized about his decision".
What is the difference between "criticized for" and "accused of"?
"Criticized for" implies disapproval or negative evaluation of an action or characteristic. "Accused of", on the other hand, implies a formal charge or allegation, often of wrongdoing or a crime. For example, someone might be criticized for poor performance but "accused of" fraud.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested