criterion with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "criterion with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is typically used in contexts where a specific standard or measure is being discussed, but the phrase itself lacks clarity and completeness. Example: "The criterion with which we evaluate the candidates must be clearly defined."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Turns out, you'll never really be playing Need For Speed alone ever again... Was it difficult to merge the sensibilities of Criterion with the Need For Speed franchise?

The Guardian - Tech

An anisotropic yield criterion with a general representation was suggested.

International Journal of Plasticity

A simulation study is performed to compare proposed model selection criterion with the existing one.

Environmental Systems Research

A precoding matrix selection criterion with low complexity can be expressed as follows.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Figure 7 Outage probability for the L-optimality criterion with the MVU estimator.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The flutter stability boundaries are determined by using the frequency coalescence criterion with the quasi-static approximation and Movchan-Krumhaar's criterion with the piston theory aerodynamics.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The latter enter a Drucker-Prager failure criterion with material constants derived from nanoindentation tests.

Cement and Concrete Research

We combine the criterion with the characterization to obtain a test for liveness.

Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science

Hill's yield criterion with isotropic hardening is used to define the plastic behavior.

International Journal of Mechanical Sciences

Analytical hierarchy process is used to weigh each criterion with respect to others.

Energy

Criterion with which to assess the optimal design of FRP anchors is also provided.

Construction and Building Materials

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Replace "criterion with" with more grammatically correct alternatives like "criterion for" or "standard for" to improve clarity and precision in writing.

Common error

Avoid using "criterion with" as it's often considered grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "criterion for" to establish a clear relationship between the criterion and what it evaluates.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "criterion with" often functions as part of a longer noun phrase, typically within scientific or technical writing. It is used to introduce a standard or measure alongside an associated element. However, according to Ludwig AI, the phrasing is grammatically questionable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

76%

News & Media

13%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "criterion with" appears frequently, particularly in scientific literature, Ludwig AI indicates that it's grammatically incorrect and awkward. Its primary function is to specify a standard or measure, but clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives like "criterion for" or "standard for" are generally recommended to enhance clarity and maintain grammatical accuracy. The prevalence of this phrase across diverse scientific sources highlights the need for careful attention to phrasing to ensure precision and professionalism in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

criterion for

This alternative replaces "with" with "for", creating a more grammatically correct and standard phrasing when referring to a specific requirement or standard.

standard for

This option substitutes both "criterion" and "with", resulting in a common and clear way to express a specific measure or guideline.

basis for

This alternative focuses on the foundation or reason behind something, instead of just the measurement itself.

measure of

This replacement changes the phrase to indicate a way of quantifying or assessing something.

method for

This suggests a procedure or approach used to determine something, shifting the focus from the standard to the process.

metric for

This alternative emphasizes a quantitative assessment or measurement, replacing the general term "criterion".

yardstick for

This alternative is more informal, replacing the word criterion with the word yardstick.

benchmark for

This option introduces the concept of a reference point or standard against which something is compared.

principle of

This replacement moves from measurement to a guiding rule or belief, changing the context slightly.

parameter for

This alternative is more specific, suggesting a measurable factor that defines a system or condition.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically correct way to phrase "criterion with"?

A more grammatically correct and clearer alternative is to use "criterion for". This phrasing establishes a clear and standard relationship between the criterion and what is being evaluated.

When is it appropriate to use "criterion with"?

While frequently used, "criterion with" is generally considered grammatically awkward. It's advisable to use alternatives like "criterion for" or "standard for" for improved clarity and correctness.

What can I say instead of "criterion with" in a formal context?

In a formal context, it's best to replace "criterion with" with phrases such as "basis for", "measure of", or "method for", which provide clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives.

Is there a difference in meaning between "criterion with" and "criterion for"?

While the intended meaning might often be understood, "criterion with" is not grammatically correct. "criterion for" is the standard and grammatically sound way to express the relationship between a criterion and what it evaluates.