standard for

USAGE SUMMARY

"standard for" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is accepted as the usual way of doing something, or a usual level of something. For example: "The new office building must meet the city's standard for energy efficiency."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

The standard for replacement?

The New York Times

I have a high standard for excellence.

The New York Times

These are standard for rooftop gun emplacement.

The New Yorker

Alsace sets the global standard for gewürztraminer.

The New York Times

The gold standard for Los Angeles coffee.

The New York Times

It's a standard for sure.

The New York Times - Arts

"There was no standard for lyrics.

The Guardian - Music

"It's the gold standard for treatment.

The New York Times

You set the standard for us all.

The New York Times

You are the gold standard for friendship.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

A double-standard for female officers plays a role.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "standard for" when you want to refer to an established norm, benchmark, or expectation.

Common error

Avoid using "standard of" when you mean "standard for". "Standard of" refers to the quality or level itself (e.g., a high standard of care), while "standard for" refers to the criteria or benchmark used.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "standard for" functions as a prepositional phrase that typically modifies a noun, specifying the criteria, benchmark, or requirements associated with it. This is supported by Ludwig, which provides numerous examples where "standard for" clarifies a measurement or expectation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

25%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "standard for" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to define criteria or benchmarks. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely used. It's important to use it to accurately define what is considered normal, expected, or required. Frequent examples from news, media, and scientific sources highlight its broad applicability. Pay attention to the difference between "standard for" and "standard of" to avoid common writing errors. By considering these guidelines, you can confidently use "standard for" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

criterion for

Focuses on the requirements or principles used to assess something.

benchmark for

Implies a standard against which others are measured.

norm for

Emphasizes what is typical or usual.

measure for

Highlights the act of quantifying or assessing something against a standard.

gauge for

Suggests an instrument or method used to determine a specific value.

yardstick for

Highlights the assessment something is measured to.

template for

Suggests a pattern or guide that is followed.

model for

Implies a system or design that serve as an example.

protocol for

Refers to established procedures or rules.

specification for

Highlights the required details or criteria.

FAQs

How is "standard for" used in a sentence?

You can use "standard for" to describe the criteria or level that something must meet. For example, "This is the "standard for" data security" or "What is the "standard for" graduation requirements?".

What are some alternatives to "standard for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "criterion for", "benchmark for", or "norm for".

When should I use "standard for" versus "standard of"?

"Standard for" specifies what something must meet or adhere to (e.g., "the "standard for" admission"), while "standard of" indicates a level of quality or performance (e.g., "a high "standard of" service").

Who determines the "standard for" something?

The entity determining the ""standard for"" varies by context. It could be an industry organization, a government agency, an internal committee, or any other group that sets specific requirements or expectations.