covered with fire

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "covered with fire" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is engulfed in flames or experiencing a fire-related event. Example: "The old building was covered with fire, sending thick plumes of smoke into the sky."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

He was covered with fire".

The New York Times - Sports

One day she finds the baby covered with fire ants, showing no reaction.

The New York Times - Books

I read out: " 'The split in the sky grew larger, and the entire northern side was covered with fire.

The New Yorker

Her story, "The Entire Northern Side Was Covered with Fire," appeared in the June 14 & 21, 2010 issue.

The New Yorker

Another twenty yards the other way, maybe we hit the propane truck, it rolls and explodes, killing not only the driver but everyone behind him, and Rose is covered with fire and screaming. . . .

The New Yorker

Another twenty yards the other way, maybe we hit the propane truck, it rolls and explodes, killing not only the driver but everyone behind him, and Rose is covered with fire and screaming...

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

That's because of fire safety – it's all covered with fire-proof gypsum board," he says.

BBC

The wax model is taken out of the (piece)mould and is filled and covered with fire-proof material as with the direct method.

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Overglaze painting is executed on a fired clay body covered with a fired glaze, underglaze painting, on a fired, unglazed body (which includes a body that has been coated with raw or unfired, glaze material).

Britannica

Port Authority workers and 30 firefighters went to the scene and used a jack to lift the equipment off the victims, both of whom were covered with blood, fire officials said.

The New York Times

The coat's sleeve is adorned with the words "Glendale Fire". He also used pieces of the fire engine to construct the firefighter's helmet, which he covered with bits of fire hose.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a scene, use "covered with fire" to vividly depict the intensity and visual impact of something being engulfed in flames. This phrase adds a dramatic element to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "covered with fire" in purely metaphorical contexts where the literal image of flames is not intended. Opt for more appropriate descriptive phrases to convey the intended meaning if the fire is not literal.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "covered with fire" functions primarily as a descriptive phrase, typically used to illustrate a scene or object that is engulfed in flames. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage is correct and suitable for describing fire-related events.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

30%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "covered with fire" is a descriptive term used to vividly portray something engulfed in flames. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and suitability for describing fire-related events. It's most frequently found in news and media, science, and encyclopedic contexts. While grammatically sound and effective for creating vivid imagery, it should be used judiciously, especially avoiding metaphorical overextension. Consider alternatives like "engulfed in flames" or "ablaze with fire" to suit the specific nuance you want to convey. Remember to use it in contexts where the literal imagery of fire is appropriate to maximize its impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

engulfed in flames

This alternative focuses on the visual aspect of being completely surrounded by flames, emphasizing the intensity of the fire.

ablaze with fire

This phrase highlights the fiery state, emphasizing the presence and intensity of the fire.

consumed by fire

This emphasizes the destructive aspect of fire, highlighting the idea that something is being destroyed by it.

on fire

This is a more direct and simple way to say that something is burning.

burning fiercely

This focuses on the intensity and speed of the burning process.

in flames

Similar to 'on fire', but can imply a more widespread or dramatic fire.

scorched by fire

This suggests damage or alteration caused by fire, rather than complete engulfment.

ignited

This describes the state of being set on fire, highlighting the beginning of the burning process.

charred by fire

Indicates a surface that has been partially burned and blackened.

kissed by fire

This uses metaphorical language to describe a light or superficial effect of fire.

FAQs

How can I use "covered with fire" in a sentence?

You can use "covered with fire" to describe something that is literally engulfed in flames, such as "The building was "covered with fire" during the blaze". It can also be used metaphorically, although sparingly.

What are some alternatives to "covered with fire"?

Alternatives include "engulfed in flames", "ablaze with fire", or "consumed by fire", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "covered with fire" in formal writing?

Yes, "covered with fire" is appropriate in formal writing when describing a scene or event where something is literally burning. However, ensure the tone and context align with the formal nature of the writing.

What's the difference between "covered with fire" and "on fire"?

"Covered with fire" suggests that flames are enveloping the object, while "on fire" is a more general term indicating that something is burning. The former emphasizes the visual spectacle of being completely surrounded by flames.