Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
engulfed in flames
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'engulfed in flames' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe something that is completely surrounded by fire. For example, "The building was quickly engulfed in flames as the fire spread throughout the structure."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
But engulfed in flames.
News & Media
It was engulfed in flames.
News & Media
Both are engulfed in flames.
News & Media
Five cars were engulfed in flames.
News & Media
Several buildings nearby were engulfed in flames.
News & Media
The image was that of a castle engulfed in flames.
News & Media
Soon, the entire car was engulfed in flames.
News & Media
His two-story wood-frame home was engulfed in flames.
News & Media
I found the building completely engulfed in flames.
News & Media
Seventeen years ago the track was engulfed in flames.
News & Media
Engulfed in flames, it shattered on the rotunda.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "engulfed in flames" to vividly depict situations where something is entirely surrounded and consumed by fire, emphasizing the intensity and destructive nature of the fire.
Common error
Avoid using "engulfed in flames" to describe situations that don't involve actual fire. Overusing it metaphorically can diminish its impact when you need to describe a real fire.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "engulfed in flames" functions as a descriptive modifier, vividly portraying the state of an object or scene that is completely surrounded and consumed by fire. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
89%
Wiki
9%
Formal & Business
1%
Less common in
Science
1%
Encyclopedias
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "engulfed in flames" is a powerful descriptor used to depict something completely surrounded by fire. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability in English. It's most commonly found in news and media, as well as wiki sources, conveying scenes of intense destruction. Related phrases include "consumed by fire" and "ablaze". While it can be used metaphorically, it's most effective when describing literal fires. Overall, it's a vivid and frequently used phrase for emphasizing the severity of a fire-related event.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
consumed by fire
Replaces "engulfed" with "consumed", emphasizing the destructive aspect of the fire.
ablaze
A shorter, more direct adjective meaning "on fire".
burning fiercely
Focuses on the intensity of the fire.
completely on fire
A more descriptive and literal alternative.
surrounded by flames
Highlights the encompassing nature of the fire.
wreathed in fire
Uses a more poetic term, "wreathed", to suggest being encircled.
a raging inferno
Describes the situation as an uncontrolled and intensely hot fire.
lost to the flames
Emphasizes the destruction and loss caused by the fire.
in a conflagration
Uses the more formal word "conflagration" to describe a large fire.
victim of arson
Implies that the flames came as a result of arson
FAQs
How can I use "engulfed in flames" in a sentence?
The phrase "engulfed in flames" is typically used to describe a scene where something is completely surrounded by fire. For instance, "The building was "completely engulfed" in flames before the firefighters arrived".
What are some synonyms for "engulfed in flames"?
Alternatives include "consumed by fire", "ablaze", or "burning fiercely". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "engulfed by flames" instead of "engulfed in flames"?
While "engulfed by flames" might be understood, "engulfed in flames" is the more common and accepted phrasing.
Can "engulfed in flames" be used metaphorically?
While primarily used to describe literal fires, "engulfed in flames" can be used metaphorically to describe situations of intense chaos or destruction, though this usage should be approached with caution to avoid hyperbole.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested