corroborating arguments

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "corroborating arguments" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing evidence or reasoning that supports a particular claim or position in an argument or debate. Example: "The researcher presented corroborating arguments to strengthen her thesis on climate change."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Both "chores inside the house" and "difficulty climbing stairs" are examples of items that are intuitively relevant which were removed based on corroborating arguments from different sources (statistics and qualitative studies).

European Respiratory Journal

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The approach was also questioned by Richard Seymour of The Guardian, who suggested it could damage Labour's electoral appeal: "Outside Scotland, this policy would merely be a gift to the Tories, by corroborating their arguments for welfare cuts.

Wikipedia

The evidence that human subjects used rms velocity as an index of vibration frequency corroborates earlier arguments that frequency perception involves subjective "intensity", a quality that is sensitive to amplitude [eg, 17].

Plosone

To corroborate his arguments, he used the hypothetical example of two health status instruments designed to evaluate therapeutic interventions in patients with chronic lung disease that were presented to the same patient sample (Table 2).

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

For a detailed discussion on the arguments corroborating the bi-level formulation, the reader is referred to [17].

Complex & Intelligent Systems

Insofar as the Hall Report assumes the requested injunction would put defendant out of business, it tends to corroborate plaintiffs' argument that Napster has no legitimate non-infringing uses.

Harvard University

Experimental results also corroborate the argument that, in high-dimensional optimization, only problems with well-formative fitness landscapes are solvable, and slope-based schemes are preferable to randomization-based ones.

Information Sciences

The unsurprising results from this long-range study on the effects of prolonged solitary confinement corroborate the argument that its widespread use in prisons is "cruel and unusual" punishment and as such violates the U.S. Constitution.

MIT Technology Review

Our results corroborate this argument, since in the presence of H2O2 or L-dopa, TyrBm was indeed active on HQ as measured by two unrelated methods (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Figs S1 and S3).

Nature

This finding corroborates the argument put forward in favor of active labor policies and against passive labor policies, like unemployment benefits, which may distort incentives to improving employability, taking up a job or searching actively.

IZA Journal of Labor Policy

Only, I never saw any figures to corroborate that argument.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "corroborating arguments" when you want to emphasize that multiple sources or pieces of evidence support a particular claim. It suggests a level of agreement and reliability.

Common error

Avoid using "corroborating arguments" in casual conversation or informal writing. Opt for simpler phrases like "supporting reasons" or "agreeing points" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corroborating arguments" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "corroborating" modifies the noun "arguments". This implies that the arguments serve to confirm or support a particular claim or viewpoint. Ludwig confirms that it is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

38%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "corroborating arguments" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe arguments that support or confirm a claim. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is most commonly found in academic, scientific, and news contexts, indicating a formal register. While the phrase is effective in strengthening a position, it should be used judiciously, avoiding overuse in informal settings. Consider alternatives like "supporting arguments" or "confirming arguments" depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

supporting arguments

Focuses on the action of providing support rather than the confirmation aspect.

confirming arguments

Highlights the confirmation aspect, suggesting existing arguments are being validated.

substantiating arguments

Implies providing concrete evidence to back up the arguments.

validating arguments

Focuses on establishing the legitimacy or correctness of the arguments.

bolstering arguments

Suggests strengthening the arguments, making them more robust.

reinforcing arguments

Emphasizes the idea of adding further strength to the existing arguments.

evidence that supports the arguments

Shifts the focus to the evidence itself rather than the action of corroborating.

arguments backed by evidence

Highlights the fact that evidence is the foundation of the arguments.

arguments with supporting data

Stresses the presence of quantitative data backing the arguments.

arguments strengthened by proof

Focuses on how proof is being used to strengthen the arguments.

FAQs

How can I use "corroborating arguments" in a sentence?

You can use "corroborating arguments" to describe evidence or reasoning that supports a claim. For example: "The lawyer presented "corroborating arguments" to support his client's innocence."

What are some alternatives to "corroborating arguments"?

Alternatives include "supporting arguments", "confirming arguments", or "substantiating arguments". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "corroborating evidence" and "corroborating arguments"?

"Corroborating evidence" refers to factual information that supports a claim, while ""corroborating arguments"" refers to reasoning or logic that strengthens a particular viewpoint or position.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "corroborating arguments"?

This phrase is suitable in academic papers, legal documents, and formal debates where a reasoned defense of a viewpoint is expected. It is less common in informal or conversational settings.