supporting arguments

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'supporting arguments' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the arguments that are provided to support a claim or opinion. For example, "The essay presented a variety of supporting arguments to demonstrate the author's point."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

In this way, all the supporting arguments for the stabilizing bracket-hypothesis would automatically become supportive for the sign-post hypothesis, as well.

Plosone

Chisholm, oddly, skipped over the detail of the supporting arguments.

The Guardian - Business

The authors include references and supporting arguments for new classifications.

The Guardian

The administration laid out some of its supporting arguments in classified memos, filed under seal.

The New York Times

Only after presenting the take-away message should you begin to present supporting arguments and data.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

I knew nothing about those logical things: supporting arguments, compare and contrast, footnotes, the Chicago Manual of Style.

The New York Times

As Gillham describes him, Galton was a competent scientist who knew the difference between solid evidence and flimsy supporting arguments.

The New York Times - Books

There are several supporting arguments: First, the screws are not ferromagnetic and are thus not affected by the magnetic field.

Nature

At this stage, I also present a series of mini-lessons on outlining, building a thesis and finding supporting arguments.

The New York Times

This omission was evident in papers, where they often came up with interesting ideas without any convincing supporting arguments.

University of California, Berkeley

They also write essays that sharpen skills in analyzing visual rhetoric, developing and supporting arguments, and using sources.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always cite your sources when presenting "supporting arguments" to maintain credibility and allow readers to verify the information.

Common error

Avoid using anecdotal evidence or personal opinions as "supporting arguments" without stronger, verifiable data. Ensure your arguments are based on credible and reliable sources to strengthen your position.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "supporting arguments" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to identify and describe the reasons or evidence that back up a claim or idea. This usage is consistent across various academic, news, and scientific contexts as identified by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

32%

News & Media

29%

Science

24%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "supporting arguments" is a versatile and frequently used noun phrase that refers to the evidence and reasoning used to back up a claim. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts, particularly in academic, news, and scientific writing. Effective use of "supporting arguments" involves providing clear, credible evidence directly relevant to the main thesis. Common errors include relying on weak evidence or personal opinions. To enhance writing, consider alternatives like "corroborating evidence" or "justifying reasons" for variety.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

corroborating evidence

Focuses on the aspect of confirming or backing up a statement with facts.

justifying reasons

Emphasizes the act of providing a valid justification for a particular action or belief.

substantiating claims

Highlights the process of validating claims with evidence.

reinforcing points

Implies strengthening existing ideas or viewpoints through additional support.

validating factors

Focuses on confirming the accuracy or legitimacy of specific factors.

underlying rationale

Emphasizes the fundamental basis or reasoning behind an argument.

backing details

Suggests providing specific details to support a broader argument or claim.

foundational reasoning

Highlights the fundamental logic and structure upon which an argument is built.

explanatory points

Focuses on clarifying or explaining aspects of a topic with evidence.

confirming facts

Emphasizes verifying information and solidifying the basis for an argument.

FAQs

How do I effectively incorporate "supporting arguments" into an essay?

Start by clearly stating your thesis, then introduce each "supporting argument" with a topic sentence. Provide evidence and reasoning for each argument, and conclude by summarizing how the arguments collectively support your thesis.

What distinguishes "supporting arguments" from opinions?

"Supporting arguments" are backed by evidence, research, and logical reasoning, whereas opinions are personal beliefs that may not have external validation. Strong "supporting arguments" rely on credible sources and verifiable data.

What can I say instead of "supporting arguments"?

You can use alternatives like "corroborating evidence", "justifying reasons", or "substantiating claims" depending on the context.

How do I evaluate the strength of "supporting arguments"?

Assess the credibility of the sources, the relevance of the evidence, and the logical consistency of the reasoning. Strong "supporting arguments" are based on reliable information and directly support the claim.