corresponding loss

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "corresponding loss" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing losses that are related or equivalent to a specific event or condition. Example: "The company reported a corresponding loss in revenue following the product recall."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There is a corresponding loss of eccentricity.

The Guardian - Music

The decline of knitting isn't just about a small gain in convenience, and a corresponding loss of skill.

The Guardian - Opinion

The increasingly sedentary lives of many children and its corresponding loss in the amount of exercise was the cause cited by 22percentt of Americans.

The New York Times - Health

If Australians respect the United States as a strong protector, they also resent what they describe as "American imperialism" and a corresponding loss of Australia's sovereignty, Mr. Mackay said.

The New York Times

The Communist Party, once the domain of peasants and factory workers, now attracts rich businessmen and middle-class professionals, and it has suffered a corresponding loss of ideological coherence.

The New Yorker

With starlings, whose populations have fallen from 84.9 million to 39.9 million, a drop of 53%, it has been the destruction of woodlands and the corresponding loss of nesting places that has done the most serious damage, he said.

The Guardian

Because persistent craving (and the corresponding loss of control) relies on brain changes (synaptic reconfigurations), addiction experts all over the world have come to define addiction as a brain disease.

The Guardian - Opinion

Moynihan alleged in a letter to the NOCs that at a meeting last July between Locog and the BOA, the Locog finance director, Neil Wood, stated the Olympics would make a profit of about £400m, with the Paralympics making a corresponding loss.

The Guardian - Sport

There are multiple reasons for increased pressures from the outside world, but the primary cause is simply the development of modern transportation and a corresponding loss of centuries-long isolation.

Encyclopedia Britannica

In it he described his conviction that money has a moral aspect and that any loss in its value will cause a corresponding loss in social and political values.

The New York Times

Results show a 50% reduction in the coffee area and a corresponding loss of trees.

Ecological Economics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "corresponding loss", ensure it is clear what the loss is directly related to. Providing context enhances clarity and strengthens the connection between the initial event and its consequence.

Common error

Avoid using "corresponding loss" when the loss is merely associated but not directly proportional to a preceding event. Using it inaccurately weakens the intended logical connection and can mislead the reader. For instance, if a decrease in sales is mentioned, the "corresponding loss" should also be directly quantifiable in monetary terms or some other relatable unit.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corresponding loss" functions as a noun phrase, where the adjective "corresponding" modifies the noun "loss". Ludwig AI examples show it describing losses that are directly related or proportional to another event or condition, indicating a cause-and-effect relationship.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

37%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "corresponding loss" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. It describes a decrease or deficit that is directly related to a preceding event, often emphasizing a proportional relationship. This phrase is most common in scientific and news-related contexts, where precision and clarity are essential. When using "corresponding loss", ensure a clear and direct relationship exists between the initial event and the resulting loss to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "associated loss" or "related loss" may be appropriate if the connection is less direct.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

associated loss

Focuses on the connection between the loss and a specific event or factor, rather than emphasizing the proportionality.

related loss

Highlights the connection without specifying the nature or degree of correspondence.

proportional loss

Emphasizes the direct relationship between the reduction and another factor.

equivalent loss

Stresses that the loss is equal in value or amount to something else.

commensurate loss

Implies that the loss is appropriately or suitably related to something else.

attendant loss

Highlights that the loss naturally accompanies or results from something else.

ensuing loss

Indicates that the loss follows as a consequence of something else.

resulting loss

Focuses on the loss as the outcome of a particular action or event.

subsequent loss

Indicates that the loss happened after a specific event but does not necessarily imply direct causation.

consequential loss

Emphasizes that the loss is an indirect result or side effect of something else.

FAQs

How can I use "corresponding loss" in a sentence?

Use "corresponding loss" to describe a decrease or deficit that directly and proportionally relates to another event or condition. For example, "The decrease in funding resulted in a "corresponding loss" of research staff".

What phrases are similar in meaning to "corresponding loss"?

Alternatives include "associated loss", "related loss", "proportional loss", or "equivalent loss". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "a corresponding loss of loss"?

Yes, it would be redundant. The word "loss" already implies a reduction or deficit. Adding "of loss" makes the phrase unnecessarily repetitive. Stick to simply using the phrase "corresponding loss".

What's the difference between "corresponding loss" and "consequential loss"?

"Corresponding loss" implies a direct, proportional relationship, while "consequential loss" refers to a loss that occurs as an indirect result or side effect. The "corresponding loss" is typically more immediate and quantifiable.