corresponded for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "corresponded for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear what context you intend to use it in, as "corresponded" typically requires a direct object or a preposition that clarifies the relationship. Example: "She corresponded with the organization regarding the event."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We corresponded for the next eight years.

The New Yorker

We corresponded for a while and then we lost touch".

The Guardian - Lifestyle

He and Nonie Drummond, 14, had corresponded for nine months before they got together.

The New York Times

The two had corresponded for years, and they'd spoken on the phone dozens of times.

The New Yorker

They met in Vienna on March 3, 1907, after having corresponded for a year.

The New York Times - Books

The two men corresponded for months about how to connect the Russian government and the campaign.

The New York Times

He corresponded for months with Lewandowski and Glassner, according to the emails.

The Washington Post

We corresponded for a while, and eventually he admitted that he's a police officer who likes the new foreign books.

The New Yorker

Welty and Maxwell, who was the fiction editor of The New Yorker from 1936-1975, corresponded for nearly fifty years.

The New Yorker

Transportation costs corresponded for all but low flow scenarios (<5000 m3/d).

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Bohm was a rare exception, and he corresponded for decades with Albert Einstein, another skeptic of quantum orthodoxies.

Princeton University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing ongoing communication, use prepositions like "with" or "over" to clarify the relationship. For example, prefer "corresponded with" or "corresponded over several months" instead of "corresponded for".

Common error

Avoid using "for" directly after "corresponded" to indicate duration. This construction is grammatically incorrect. Use "with" to indicate the person or entity you corresponded with, or use a different preposition like "over" to indicate a duration. For instance, use "I corresponded with her" or "I corresponded over two years" instead of "I corresponded for two years".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "corresponded for" is typically intended to describe a past act of communication over a specific duration, often through written means. However, Ludwig AI notes that this construction is grammatically questionable and generally considered incorrect in standard English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Science

28%

Academia

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "corresponded for" appears with some frequency, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect according to Ludwig AI. Standard English prefers constructions like "corresponded with" or alternative phrasings such as "communicated with" or "exchanged letters with". Although found across different source types—News & Media, Science, and Academia—its incorrect usage impacts its overall suitability. When describing communication exchanges, opting for grammatically sound alternatives will enhance clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

communicated with

Focuses on the act of exchanging information, shifting from a duration to a direct interaction.

exchanged letters with

Emphasizes written correspondence rather than general communication.

were in contact with

Highlights the state of maintaining communication over a period.

maintained correspondence with

Underscores the continuous nature of the written exchange.

were pen pals with

Implies a more informal and personal exchange of letters.

had a dialogue with

Suggests a more interactive and reciprocal form of communication.

were in communication

Highlights the state of being connected through communication channels.

exchanged messages with

Broadens the type of communication beyond letters to include digital forms.

kept in touch with

Emphasizes the effort to maintain a relationship through communication.

liaised with

Indicates a formal or professional communication, often for coordination.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "corresponded" in a sentence?

Use "corresponded with" to indicate who you communicated with, or use "corresponded over" to specify a time period. For example, "I "corresponded with" the author" or "We "corresponded over" several years".

Is it correct to say "corresponded for"?

No, "corresponded for" is not considered grammatically correct. Instead, use "corresponded with" or rephrase the sentence to use alternatives like "communicated with" or "exchanged letters with".

What's the difference between "corresponded with" and "corresponded for"?

"Corresponded with" is the correct usage, indicating who you exchanged communication with. "Corresponded for" is grammatically incorrect. Use alternatives like "were in contact with" or "maintained correspondence with" instead.

What are some alternatives to "corresponded for" that I can use in my writing?

Consider using phrases like "communicated with", "exchanged letters with", or "were in contact with" to express similar ideas with correct grammar.