Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
corresponded with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"corresponded with" is a perfectly correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to indicate that two or more people had exchanged letters, emails, or other written communications with each other. For example, "George and Jane corresponded with each other for nearly two years before they finally met face-to-face."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(20)
communicated with
maintained contact with
kept in touch with
emailed
had a dialogue with
interacted with
is equivalent to
in the wishes of
rapidly thereafter
for the immediate future
Very soon
somewhere later
one week before
at the early time
in the next weeks
during the previous years
it is important to remember
to avoid disruption
not yet completed
in accordance with direction from
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
54 human-written examples
Many others visited or corresponded with him.
Encyclopedias
Finlay corresponded with Hitler's architect, Albert Speer.
News & Media
Felton corresponded with the lawyer about what he was reading.
News & Media
He corresponded with the serial killer Ted Bundy.
News & Media
He corresponded with beautiful, educated women who read his drafts.
News & Media
I corresponded with the commenter by e-mail.
News & Media
He corresponded with her until the end of his life.
News & Media
That has corresponded with an increase in e-book sales.
News & Media
For two years, he corresponded with Fannie executives and lawyers.
News & Media
Butler's departure corresponded with the Fire's linking with Nike.
News & Media
They also found this corresponded with a halving of stillbirths.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "corresponded with", ensure the context clearly indicates written communication, as opposed to other forms of interaction. For example, "She "corresponded with" him regularly via email" leaves no room for misinterpretation.
Common error
Don't assume that because two people "corresponded with" each other, they necessarily agreed on anything. The phrase only indicates an exchange of communication, not a consensus. For instance, political opponents can "corresponded with" each other without finding common ground.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "corresponded with" functions as a verb phrase, indicating the act of exchanging written communication between two or more parties. As evidenced by Ludwig, it denotes a direct and intentional act of communication, primarily through letters or emails.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
23%
Encyclopedias
5%
Less common in
Wiki
4%
Formal & Business
2%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "corresponded with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used verb phrase indicating the exchange of written communication. Ludwig AI confirms this, citing numerous examples from news, science, and encyclopedia sources. While generally neutral to professional in tone, the phrase implies intentional and direct communication, as opposed to other forms of interaction. When you aim to suggest a written exchange, opting for "corresponded with" offers clarity. Remember to avoid assuming agreement between parties simply because they "corresponded with" each other; the phrase only denotes an exchange, not necessarily a consensus.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
communicated with
Emphasizes the act of exchanging information, not necessarily in written form; broader in scope than "corresponded with".
were in correspondence
Similar in formality, emphasizes the existence of a written exchange but less about the content.
exchanged letters with
Specifically highlights the exchange of physical letters, whereas "corresponded with" can include email or other written formats.
maintained contact with
Focuses on the ongoing nature of the communication, implying a sustained relationship.
kept in touch with
Suggests a casual or informal exchange of information; less formal than "corresponded with".
were in communication with
A more formal and passive way of saying that a dialogue was maintained.
wrote to
Highlights the act of writing, but does not necessarily imply a response or ongoing exchange.
emailed
Specifically refers to communication via email, a modern subset of "corresponded with".
had a dialogue with
Implies a more active and engaged conversation, potentially including spoken communication.
interacted with
Broadly refers to any form of interaction, not limited to written communication.
FAQs
What does "corresponded with" mean?
The phrase "corresponded with" means to have exchanged letters, emails, or other forms of written communication with someone.
What is a synonym for "corresponded with"?
A synonym for "corresponded with" is "communicated with", although this doesn't necessarily imply written communication.
How formal is the phrase "corresponded with"?
The phrase "corresponded with" is relatively formal and suitable for use in professional or academic contexts.
Is it correct to say "I corresponded to" instead of "I corresponded with"?
No, the correct preposition to use with "corresponded" in this context is "with". Saying "I corresponded to" is grammatically incorrect.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested