convicted with

USAGE SUMMARY

"convicted with" is correct and can be used in written English.
You use it when referring to someone, or something, being found guilty of a crime or offense in a court of law. For example, "The defendant was convicted with manslaughter".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Mr. Bacanovic was convicted with Ms. Stewart in March.

The New York Times

Meanwhile, Conteh was convicted with three other boys of manslaughter.

The Guardian

Known as Perarivalan, he was convicted with 25 others of killing Rajiv Gandhi in 1991.

The Economist

Over 70 people were convicted with him, in a trial lasting 12 years.

The Economist

In 1970, he was convicted, with four others, of having extorted $1.4 million from city contractors.

The New Yorker

Two men were convicted, with the girlfriend of one saying he had confessed to her.

The New York Times

Forty-five whaves have been convicted, with the town's different racial groups being tried separately.

The Guardian

"Scooter Libby was tried and convicted with less evidence," said Mr. Durkin, a former prosecutor.

The New York Times

But black men and women have been convicted with much less to work with".

The Guardian - Opinion

The former minister, Yevgeny O. Adamov, was convicted with two other former Russian nuclear energy officials.

The New York Times

Only one of Fuentes's colleagues, Ignacio Labarta, a former trainer for the cycling team Kelme, was convicted with him Tuesday.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "convicted with", ensure you are referring to individuals found guilty of a crime in the same legal proceeding. Be precise about the crime they were convicted of.

Common error

Avoid substituting "with" with other prepositions like "of" or "for". "Convicted with" specifies co-defendants or accomplices, whereas "convicted of" specifies the crime.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "convicted with" functions as a verb phrase, specifically indicating that someone has been found guilty of a crime in conjunction with other individuals. Ludwig examples illustrate its use in news and legal contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Wiki

1%

Science

1%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "convicted with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It's mainly used in news and media to report on legal cases where multiple individuals are found guilty together. While grammatically sound, remember that "convicted with" refers to co-defendants or accomplices in a crime, not the crime itself (which would be "convicted of"). Consider alternatives like "found guilty with" or "convicted alongside" for stylistic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

found guilty with

Replaces "convicted" with a more general term for legal culpability, maintaining the core meaning of shared guilt.

convicted alongside

Replaces "with" with "alongside" to emphasize the simultaneous nature of the convictions.

tried and convicted with

Emphasizes the process leading to the conviction, highlighting that a trial took place.

convicted together with

Emphasizes the collective nature of the conviction, highlighting that the individuals were found guilty as a group.

prosecuted with

Focuses on the legal action taken against the individuals, shifting the emphasis from the outcome to the process.

charged and convicted with

Highlights both the initial accusation and the subsequent verdict, adding a layer of detail about the legal proceedings.

sentenced with

Shifts the focus to the punishment received after conviction, rather than the conviction itself.

convicted in conjunction with

Uses more formal language to indicate that the convictions were related or connected.

imprisoned with

Specifies the consequence of the conviction, indicating that the individuals were incarcerated together.

indicted with

Focuses on the formal accusation by a grand jury, rather than the final verdict.

FAQs

How is "convicted with" used in a sentence?

"Convicted with" indicates that someone was found guilty alongside other individuals in the same trial or legal process. For example, "He was "convicted with" two accomplices".

What's the difference between "convicted with" and "convicted of"?

"Convicted with" refers to being found guilty alongside others. "Convicted of" refers to the specific crime someone is found guilty of. For instance, "He was "convicted with" fraud and "convicted of" embezzlement".

What can I say instead of "convicted with"?

Alternatives include "found guilty with", "tried and convicted with", or "convicted alongside" depending on the specific context you want to emphasize.

Is it correct to say "convicted with"?

Yes, "convicted with" is correct when you want to indicate that a person was found guilty of a crime alongside other individuals in the same legal proceeding. It is frequently used in legal and news contexts.