found guilty with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "found guilty with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used in legal contexts to indicate a verdict, but the correct phrasing would be "found guilty of." Example: "The jury found the defendant guilty of theft after a lengthy trial."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Mr. Jordan who had been found guilty with the others last week, was per sonally fined $350.

The New York Times

Last July, the Argentina forward and his father Jorge were sentenced to 21 months in prison after being found guilty, with Barcelona subsequently launching a social media campaign with the hashtag #WeAreAllLeoMessi.

The Guardian - Sport

Later, officials made another discovery: The chaplain was an ex-convict who had been found guilty with three other men of the murder of a customer during a robbery of a supermarket in Harlem in 1976.

The New York Times

In 1993, he was found guilty with several other bicheiros of criminal conspiracy, including ordering killings.

BBC

The expectation is for something similar this time if found guilty, with commentators universally ruling out any prospect of the team being stripped of their Super Bowl berth.

BBC

Parisse, an inspirational captain for the Azzurri who has won 93 caps and scored the first try in Italy's shock win over France, would miss their final three Six Nations if found guilty, with any suspension applying to the Championship.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

He was also found guilty, along with Ellie's mother, Jennie Gray, 36, of child cruelty.

The Guardian

Disrael Lima, a retired colonel and former head of military intelligence, was found guilty along with his son, Capt.

The New York Times

Little wonder that Yakub was shocked to be found guilty and, with some of his family, face spells in jail.

The Guardian

Records show that Imam Abdu-Shahid was found guilty, along with three other men, of murdering a customer during a robbery of a supermarket in Harlem in December 1976.

The New York Times

Mr. Williams, 33, was found guilty along with his father, Elijah Bobby Williams, 49, of three killings on Feb. 18 , 1996 in Wilkinsburg, Pa., in a dispute over a cocaine deal.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "found guilty of" instead of "found guilty with". The preposition "of" is grammatically correct and standard in legal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using the preposition "with" after "found guilty". This is a common error; always use "of" to ensure grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "found guilty with" functions as a predicate adjective describing a state of being culpable in conjunction with others. However, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI reports that the correct usage is "found guilty of."

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "found guilty with" is an incorrect construction. The correct phrasing is "found guilty of". Ludwig AI highlights that this error involves using the incorrect preposition. While the phrase appears in various news sources, adhering to standard grammatical conventions is essential for clear and professional communication. Remember that using "found guilty of" or alternatives like "convicted of" will ensure your writing is accurate and credible.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

found guilty of

Replaces the preposition "with" by "of" in order to make the phrase grammatically correct.

convicted with

Uses "convicted" instead of "found guilty", slightly altering the legal connotation.

convicted alongside

Emphasizes the joint conviction of multiple parties but with different wording.

determined to be complicit with

Focuses on complicity rather than a direct guilty verdict, implying involvement.

adjudged guilty in conjunction with

A more formal and legalistic phrasing, highlighting the related action.

held accountable along with

Shifts the focus to accountability, suggesting responsibility for an action.

implicated with

Indicates involvement in a crime or wrongdoing, but without a formal guilty verdict.

deemed responsible together with

Highlights shared responsibility, diverging from the specific legal finding of guilt.

found to be in league with

Suggests a partnership or alliance in carrying out an unlawful act, less direct than guilt.

judged in concert with

Similar to being in league, but suggests coordinated action rather than individual guilt.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say someone was judged as culpable?

The correct way to phrase it is to say someone was "found guilty of" a crime, not "found guilty with".

What preposition should I use after "found guilty"?

The correct preposition to use after "found guilty" is "of". Thus, the correct phrase is "found guilty of".

Is "found guilty with" grammatically correct?

No, "found guilty with" is not grammatically correct. The standard and accepted phrasing is "found guilty of".

What can I say instead of "found guilty with"?

A correct alternative to "found guilty with" is "convicted of" or the grammatically proper phrase "found guilty of".