Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
contradicts with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"contradicts with" is correct and it is a usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when something is not in agreement with something else. For example: His statement contradicts with the facts.
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(19)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Well, let's take a look at three key findings of PISA 2012 to see how GERM contradicts with that evidence.
News & Media
Furthermore,, which contradicts with.
which contradicts with (36).
So,, which contradicts with.
which contradicts with (10).
This contradicts with (26).
leads to, which contradicts with.
But this contradicts with (2.5).
This contradicts with Equation (2.3).
This contradicts with common sense.
However, it contradicts with (3.8).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "contradicts with", ensure that both elements being compared are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify what the subject contradicts and what it contradicts with.
Common error
While "contradicts with" is grammatically correct, consider using more sophisticated synonyms like "is inconsistent with" or "is at odds with" in formal academic or professional writing to enhance clarity and precision.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "contradicts with" functions as a verb phrase indicating disagreement or opposition between two statements, facts, or ideas. It's commonly used to highlight inconsistencies, as shown by Ludwig's examples.
Frequent in
Science
64%
News & Media
13%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "contradicts with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to indicate disagreement or inconsistency. According to Ludwig, it is correct and usable in written English. Its usage is particularly common in scientific and news contexts, as evidenced by the numerous examples provided. While appropriate for general use, consider employing more formal alternatives in academic writing to enhance precision. When using the phrase, ensure both compared elements are well-defined to avoid ambiguity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
is inconsistent with
This phrase highlights the lack of uniformity or coherence.
is contrary to
This phrase suggests a fundamental opposition in nature or character.
clashes with
This alternative uses a more confrontational verb to indicate disagreement.
conflicts with
This phrase implies a direct opposition or incompatibility.
is irreconcilable with
This suggests an incompatibility that cannot be resolved.
runs counter to
This suggests that something goes against the expected direction or norm.
does not align with
This alternative highlights a lack of agreement or correspondence.
disagrees with
This is a more straightforward and less formal way to express contradiction.
is at odds with
This alternative emphasizes the state of being in opposition.
is in opposition to
This alternative emphasizes direct resistance or antagonism.
FAQs
How to use "contradicts with" in a sentence?
You can use "contradicts with" to show disagreement or opposition between two ideas or statements. For example: "His statement "contradicts with" the evidence."
What can I say instead of "contradicts with"?
You can use alternatives like "clashes with", "conflicts with", or "is inconsistent with" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "contradicts to" instead of "contradicts with"?
No, "contradicts to" is not grammatically correct. The correct usage is "contradicts with". For example, "The new data "contradicts with" the previous findings."
What is the difference between "contradicts with" and "differs from"?
"Contradicts with" implies a direct opposition or inconsistency, while "differs from" simply means that there are differences without necessarily implying a conflict. For example, "His approach "differs from" mine, but it doesn't necessarily "contradicts with" it."
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested