conspicuously deficient

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conspicuously deficient" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is clearly lacking or inadequate in a noticeable way. Example: "The report was conspicuously deficient in data analysis, leading to questionable conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The representation of Nematostella homeoboxes within the Hox families was conspicuously deficient when compared to the normal distribution of Nematostella to bilaterian genes within multi-family clades [ 26].

Biology Direct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Here, spirit is conspicuously lacking.

The Guardian

Inter-disciplinary, community-based approaches are conspicuously lacking.

BMC Health Services Research

"Yin deficient.

The New Yorker

I felt conspicuously human.

The New Yorker

Gloria was conspicuously absent.

The New York Times

Modelo conspicuously does not.

The Economist

How conspicuously?

The New York Times

Is he mentally deficient?

The New York Times

However, the CVs changed conspicuously.

Journal of Hydrology

The store was conspicuously upscale.

The New York Times - Magazine

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "conspicuously deficient", ensure that the context makes the deficiency readily apparent to the reader. The term works best when the lack is not only present but also noticeably so.

Common error

Avoid using "conspicuously deficient" when the deficiency is already heavily implied or explicitly stated. This can result in redundant writing and weaken the impact of your message.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conspicuously deficient" functions as an adverb-adjective combination, modifying a noun to emphasize a clear and obvious lack or inadequacy. This combination intensifies the sense of something being notably below the required standard, as seen in the Ludwig example where the representation of Nematostella homeoboxes was described.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "conspicuously deficient" is a phrase used to describe something that is noticeably lacking or inadequate. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, although its occurrence is rare across various contexts. Predominantly found in scientific and formal writings, it serves to emphasize significant shortcomings. When using this phrase, ensure that the deficiency is readily apparent and avoid redundancy. Alternatives like "noticeably lacking" or "glaringly absent" can provide similar emphasis with slight nuances. Considering its formal tone, reserve "conspicuously deficient" for contexts where precision and clarity are paramount.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

noticeably lacking

Emphasizes the ease with which the deficiency can be observed.

markedly inadequate

Highlights the degree to which something falls short of expectations.

patently insufficient

Stresses the obvious and undeniable nature of the insufficiency.

glaringly absent

Focuses on the conspicuous absence of something.

strikingly inadequate

Highlights the surprising or remarkable degree of inadequacy.

clearly insufficient

Emphasizes the clarity and lack of doubt regarding the insufficiency.

obviously wanting

Indicates that something is clearly missing or needed.

significantly impaired

Highlights the extent to which something is damaged or weakened.

visibly flawed

Focuses on the readily apparent imperfections.

plainly defective

Stresses the clear and unambiguous nature of the defect.

FAQs

How can I use "conspicuously deficient" in a sentence?

You can use "conspicuously deficient" to describe something that is noticeably lacking or inadequate. For example: "The budget was "conspicuously deficient" in funding for education."

What are some alternatives to "conspicuously deficient"?

Alternatives include "noticeably lacking", "markedly inadequate", or "glaringly absent", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "conspicuously deficient" formal or informal?

The phrase "conspicuously deficient" is generally considered to be formal and suitable for professional or academic writing. It is not typically used in casual conversation.

What does "conspicuously" mean in the context of "conspicuously deficient"?

In this context, "conspicuously" means 'in a way that is easily noticeable' or 'obviously'. So, "conspicuously deficient" means that something is noticeably or obviously lacking.