Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
consistent with the previous
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "consistent with the previous" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that aligns or agrees with what was stated or done before. Example: "The findings of this study are consistent with the previous research conducted on the same topic."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
This is consistent with the previous studies.
Science
This is consistent with the previous analysis.
All results are consistent with the previous results.
Science
The results were highly consistent with the previous models.
The observed result is consistent with the previous report [29].
These Raman peaks are consistent with the previous reports [20].
Science
This finding is consistent with the previous SEM measurements.
Science
This result was consistent with the previous reports [4, 12].
Science
These results are consistent with the previous test.
This is consistent with the previous reports [41 43].
Science
They are also consistent with the previous studies.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "consistent with the previous", ensure that the comparison is clear and the source of the previous information is explicitly stated or easily understood from the context. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "consistent with the previous" without providing evidence or reference to the prior information. Failing to do so weakens your argument and reduces credibility.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "consistent with the previous" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun or clause to indicate agreement or alignment with prior information. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is commonly used to show coherence between current findings and past data or studies.
Frequent in
Science
89%
News & Media
6%
Formal & Business
5%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "consistent with the previous" is a frequently used adjectival phrase that indicates agreement or alignment with prior information. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is considered grammatically correct and is most commonly found in scientific and academic contexts. When using this phrase, clarity and explicit references to the source of prior information are key to effective communication. Related phrases include "in agreement with the foregoing" and "aligning with the prior". While the phrase is generally formal, its direct and clear meaning makes it a valuable tool in professional writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
in agreement with the foregoing
Replaces "consistent" with "in agreement" and "previous" with "foregoing" offering a more formal tone.
aligning with the prior
Uses "aligning" instead of "consistent" and "prior" instead of "previous", suggesting a similar alignment.
concordant with what came before
Employs "concordant" to mean in agreement and rephrases "the previous" as "what came before".
in line with earlier
Uses "in line with" as a substitute for "consistent with" and "earlier" for "previous", indicating alignment.
matching the precedent
Replaces "consistent" with "matching" and "previous" with "precedent", focusing on similar preceding cases.
corresponding to the established
Uses "corresponding to" instead of "consistent with" and "established" for "previous", emphasizing a connection to something already known.
in keeping with what has been
Employs "in keeping with" to convey consistency and rephrases "previous" as "what has been".
bearing out earlier findings
Substitutes "consistent with" with "bearing out", highlighting confirmation of prior results.
harmonizing with the past
Uses "harmonizing with" to suggest agreement and replaces "previous" with "past", indicating alignment with historical data.
echoing the foregoing
Replaces "consistent with" with "echoing", suggesting a reiteration of prior statements or findings, and "previous" with "foregoing".
FAQs
How can I use "consistent with the previous" in a sentence?
You can use "consistent with the previous" to indicate that new information aligns with prior findings or statements. For example, "The experimental results are "consistent with the previous" study conducted last year".
What are some alternatives to saying "consistent with the previous"?
Alternatives include "in agreement with the foregoing", "aligning with the prior", or "in line with earlier" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "consistent with the previous study" or "consistent with previous studies"?
The choice depends on whether you are referring to a single study or multiple studies. Use "study" for a single one and "studies" for multiple. For example, "consistent with the previous study" vs "consistent with previous studies".
What's the difference between "consistent with the previous" and "in accordance with"?
"Consistent with the previous" implies agreement with prior information, while "in accordance with" suggests compliance or conformity with rules or guidelines. They are not always interchangeable.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested