consistent with previous studies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "consistent with previous studies" is correct and usable in written English.
This phrase can be used when referring to findings in a research study that support previously conducted research. For example: "Our results were consistent with previous studies, indicating that the treatment was effective."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The results in Long Island were consistent with previous studies.

The New York Times

Nevertheless, the findings presented here are consistent with previous studies.

Nature

These findings are consistent with previous studies of bipolar disorder, and largely consistent with previous studies of schizophrenia.

Nature

These results, published in December in the journal Cancer, are consistent with previous studies.

The New York Times - Health

That result was predictable, and it is consistent with previous studies.

The New York Times

This is a finding consistent with previous studies.

Urban Forestry & Urban Greening

This finding is consistent with previous studies regarding the σ 1 orientation in the Kamaishi mine31.

Nature

The results are consistent with previous studies where dairy products decreased the GI of foods.

Nature

Relationships within Anophelinae were well resolved and consistent with previous studies.

Nature

Consistent with previous studies, we demonstrated ERK activity to modulate IL-10 production56,57.

Nature

These findings are consistent with previous studies based on whole-genome comparisons4,17,18.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "consistent with previous studies", specify which studies you are referring to, or provide a general citation to the relevant body of literature to enhance credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "consistent with previous studies" without providing specific context or citations. Overgeneralizing can weaken your argument and make your research appear less rigorous.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consistent with previous studies" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun (often 'results', 'findings', or 'observations') to indicate that the findings align with prior research. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely accepted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

55%

News & Media

25%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "consistent with previous studies" is a widely used and grammatically correct way to indicate that current research aligns with existing literature. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is appropriate for formal writing, particularly in scientific and academic contexts. Its primary function is to establish credibility and validity by demonstrating agreement with prior findings. While common, it's crucial to provide specific context or citations to avoid overgeneralization. Alternatives like "in line with prior research" or "aligns with earlier findings" can offer stylistic variation. Overall, "consistent with previous studies" is a valuable tool for researchers and writers aiming to strengthen their arguments by referencing established knowledge.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in line with prior research

Focuses on alignment; slightly more concise.

aligns with earlier findings

Highlights the alignment of results; uses "findings" instead of "studies".

corroborates prior work

Emphasizes the corroborating nature of the new results; more formal.

supports existing literature

Focuses on providing support for established knowledge; academic tone.

confirms earlier investigations

Highlights the confirmation aspect of the study; uses "investigations" instead of "studies".

is in accordance with previous research

Formal and emphasizes agreement; slightly more verbose.

agrees with past studies

Simplifies the phrasing while maintaining the core meaning.

mirrors earlier research

Emphasizes the similarity in results; more figurative language.

bears out previous work

Implies confirmation through evidence; slightly less common.

is congruent with existing scholarship

Formal and emphasizes the agreement with scholarly work.

FAQs

How can I use "consistent with previous studies" in a sentence?

You can use "consistent with previous studies" to show that your results align with existing research. For example, "The observed increase in reaction time was "consistent with previous studies" on sleep deprivation".

What are some alternatives to "consistent with previous studies"?

Alternatives include phrases like "in line with prior research", "aligns with earlier findings", or "supports existing literature".

Is it better to say "consistent with previous studies" or "supported by previous studies"?

Both phrases are valid, but "consistent with previous studies" implies agreement, while "supported by previous studies" suggests that the previous studies provide evidence for the current findings. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What does it mean when results are "consistent with previous studies"?

When results are "consistent with previous studies", it means the new findings align with, support, or confirm the results of earlier research on the same or related topics, increasing the reliability and validity of the conclusions.