Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

consequences on

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase “consequences on” is correct and usable in written English.
You might use it when referring to the effects that an event, action, or situation has had on something. For example, "The lockdown has had severe consequences on the economy."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Loneliness has dramatic consequences on health.

There are no consequences on the court, right?

But we also thought about the consequences on our relationship.

News & Media

The New York Times

The instability and chaos can have severe consequences on Jordan".

News & Media

The New York Times

It has numerous consequences on patients' life.

However, lactate may have consequences on lymphocytes functionality during sepsis.

Some consequences on existing fixed point theorems are also derived.

Some consequences on existing fixed point theorems are provided.

Mobile position has less consequences on fairness with PF.

The consequences on permeability measurement in reinforced structures are discussed.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

It could have bigger consequences on the stock market.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing broader or less direct effects, consider alternatives like "implications for" or "impacts on" for nuanced communication.

Common error

Avoid using "consequences to" instead of "consequences on" when referring to the entity or area affected by the consequences. "On" is the standard preposition in this construction.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "consequences on" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun or verb phrase to indicate the results or effects of something upon something else. Ludwig AI validates this use.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

31%

Formal & Business

32%

Less common in

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "consequences on" is a grammatically correct and highly versatile prepositional phrase used to describe the effects or results of an action or event. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and common usage. It is prevalent across various contexts, including science, news, and formal writing. While "consequences on" is widely accepted, related phrases like "impacts on" or "implications for" can offer nuanced alternatives depending on the specific meaning you wish to convey. A common mistake is using "consequences to" instead of "consequences on", so always ensure you use the correct preposition. Remember that depending on the context you may express yourself better using words like "results in". You might also consider alternatives like "effects on" or "repercussions for" depending on context.

FAQs

How do I use "consequences on" in a sentence?

Use "consequences on" to describe the effects or outcomes of an action or event upon something. For example, "The decision had significant consequences on the company's profits."

What are some alternatives to "consequences on"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "impacts on", "effects on", or "implications for".

Is it more appropriate to use "consequences for" or "consequences on"?

While both can be correct, "consequences on" is generally used to indicate a direct effect on something, whereas "consequences for" often implies repercussions or implications specifically directed toward a person or group.

How do "consequences on" differ from "results in"?

"Consequences on" typically highlights the effects something has on a particular subject or entity, whereas "results in" emphasizes what is caused by something. For example, "The policy had consequences on the environment" versus "The policy results in environmental damage."

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: