confrontations with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "confrontations with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing conflicts, disagreements, or encounters with individuals or groups. Example: "The report detailed the various confrontations with local authorities during the protest."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Physical confrontations with coaches.

The New York Times - Sports

Second, wait for confrontations with the police.

The New York Times

There were accidents and confrontations with motorists.

The Guardian

There were violent confrontations with Israeli troops.

The New York Times

It sometimes led to confrontations with officialdom.

The New York Times

"I can't actually have confrontations with people.

The Guardian

Parents have not reported any confrontations with other patrons.

The New York Times

And some have, creating political confrontations with gun owners.

The New York Times

There were more confrontations with the regular Joes.

The New York Times

Al-Shabaab avoids most direct confrontations with conventional armies.

The Guardian

Tempers are running short and confrontations with guards more frequent.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "confrontations with", ensure the context clearly defines who or what the confrontations are with to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify "confrontations with the authorities" rather than just "confrontations".

Common error

Avoid using passive voice when describing "confrontations with". Instead of saying "Confrontations with the police were had", opt for the more direct "Protesters had confrontations with the police" for clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "confrontations with" functions as a prepositional phrase, often acting as an adjectival modifier to describe the type or nature of interactions. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is correct and usable in written English, indicating its established grammatical function. It's used to specify who or what is being confronted.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

6%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Academia

1%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "confrontations with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase, as validated by Ludwig AI. It serves to describe scenarios involving conflict or disagreement. Analysis reveals its prevalence in News & Media, followed by Science and Encyclopedias, indicating a generally neutral register. While various alternatives exist, such as ""clashes with"" and ""conflicts with"", the choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Remember to clarify the subject of the confrontations for improved clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

clashes with

Focuses more on physical or direct conflict.

conflicts with

Emphasizes incompatibility or disagreement.

disputes with

Highlights disagreements or arguments.

altercations with

Suggests heated or angry exchanges.

tensions with

Implies strained relationships or underlying conflict.

run-ins with

Indicates brief or chance encounters that involve conflict.

standoffs with

Highlights situations of deadlock or opposition.

hostilities with

Focuses on aggressive or warlike interactions.

arguments with

Emphasizes verbal disagreements.

quarrels with

Suggests petty or minor disagreements.

FAQs

How can I use "confrontations with" in a sentence?

You can use "confrontations with" to describe situations involving conflict or opposition. For example, "The activists had several "clashes with" the authorities during the protest."

What are some alternatives to "confrontations with"?

Alternatives include "conflicts with", "disputes with", or "altercations with", depending on the specific context and nature of the interaction.

Is it better to use "confrontations with" or "confrontations between"?

"Confrontations with" typically indicates an imbalance of power or a direct opposition, whereas "confrontations between" suggests a more balanced, reciprocal interaction. Choose the phrase that best reflects the dynamics of the situation you're describing.

What's the difference between "confrontations with" and "tensions with"?

"Confrontations with" implies direct and often overt conflicts, while "tensions with" suggests underlying stress or potential conflict that hasn't necessarily erupted into open disagreement.