conflicts to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "conflicts to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not typically used in standard English, and it may confuse readers. Example: "The new policy conflicts to the previous regulations, causing confusion among employees."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Not disclosing conflicts, to me, severely undermines your credibility".

The New York Times

And more crowding means more conflicts to mediate.

The New York Times

But leaving Balkan conflicts to the Europeans does not work.

The New York Times

"We are against importing inner-Turkish conflicts to Germany".

The Guardian

Now the lack of institutionalized central power brought group conflicts to the fore.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Whatever else you say about them, they don't allow conflicts to drag on and on.

Independent

Louis VIII managed to bring these external and internal conflicts to an end.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"And Texas law is way too weak in allowing those conflicts to exist".

The New York Times

The emperor and the feudal lords exploited the conflicts to promote their selfish interests.

Encyclopedia Britannica

We want to end those conflicts to the extent humanly possible.

The New York Times

"We'd like to end all these conflicts to find a common way," Mr. Lautier said.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to conflicting ideas or actions, use the correct preposition, typically "with", instead of "to". For example, "The new policy conflicts with the existing regulations."

Common error

Avoid using "to" after "conflicts"; it is grammatically incorrect. The correct preposition is typically "with", which accurately conveys the relationship of opposition or disagreement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "conflicts to" is used, although incorrectly, to indicate incompatibility or opposition between two or more entities. The intended function is to show a relationship of discord, but the incorrect preposition undermines the clarity. According to Ludwig, the phrase is not correct and may confuse readers.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

36%

Encyclopedias

12%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "conflicts to" appears in various sources, it's grammatically incorrect. The correct preposition to use is "with". Ludwig AI emphasizes that "conflicts to" may confuse readers. When writing, ensure you use "conflicts with" to accurately convey opposition or disagreement. Alternative phrases like "clashes with" or "contradicts" can also be used depending on the specific context to provide clarity and grammatical correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

conflicts with

Replaces 'to' with 'with' indicating a direct opposition or disagreement.

conflicts against

Substitutes 'to' with 'against' to emphasize a more adversarial relationship.

clashes with

Uses 'clashes' instead of 'conflicts' to describe more direct and forceful disagreements.

contradicts

Replaces the entire phrase with 'contradicts' to point out direct oppositions.

is at odds with

Emphasizes a state of disagreement or incompatibility using a more descriptive phrase.

is in opposition to

Highlights a formal or structured disagreement, often in a political or ideological context.

is contrary to

Indicates that something goes against or violates a rule, principle, or expectation.

is inconsistent with

Emphasizes the lack of alignment or coherence between different elements or ideas.

is incompatible with

Highlights that two things cannot coexist or function together harmoniously.

runs counter to

Suggests that something opposes or goes against the prevailing trend or direction.

FAQs

What preposition should I use after the word "conflicts"?

The correct preposition to use after "conflicts" is typically "with". For example, "This plan conflicts with the budget."

Is it grammatically correct to say "conflicts to"?

No, "conflicts to" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The standard construction is "conflicts with". According to Ludwig, the phrase "conflicts to" is not correct.

What can I say instead of "conflicts to"?

Use "conflicts with" instead of "conflicts to". Other alternatives include "clashes with", "contradicts", or "is at odds with", depending on the specific context.

How does "conflicts with" differ from "conflicts to"?

"Conflicts with" is grammatically correct and indicates a direct opposition or disagreement. "Conflicts to" is not standard English and does not effectively convey a clear meaning.