Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
conduct with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "conduct with" is not correct and usable in written English.
To be grammatically correct and usable, you should use "conducted with" instead. For example: The investigation was conducted with care and attention to detail.
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Academia
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
He refuses to guest conduct with other orchestras.
News & Media
Ransom Wilson will conduct with stage direction by Marc Verzatt.
Academia
-- that they conduct with fierce and lofty sententiousness, often while naked.
News & Media
In 2001, she was invited to conduct, with Glyndebourne's touring company.
News & Media
Mr. Helms's admirers have long equated his obstructionist conduct with the defense of high principles.
News & Media
Instead, he repeatedly characterizes his own conduct with that warmly dialectical, forgivable baseball word, boneheaded.
News & Media
I suppose he had come to the point where he could conduct with his little finger.
News & Media
Cool certain metals below a critical temperature and they conduct with no resistance.
News & Media
And what we were being accused of and charged with was improper conduct with a witness.
News & Media
Invitations to participate in the interviews we conduct with innovators, entrepreneurs, and industry luminaries?
News & Media
Under that embargo, American companies face severe restrictions on the business they can conduct with Cuba.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the past participle form, "conducted", when referring to an action that has been completed or is being described in the past tense. Using "conduct with" without the -ed is grammatically incorrect.
Common error
A common mistake is to omit the '-ed' from "conducted", resulting in the grammatically incorrect "conduct with". Remember to always use "conducted with" to ensure proper grammar.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "conduct with" functions primarily as part of a verb phrase where "conduct" is intended as a verb, but it is grammatically incomplete without the '-ed' ending in most contexts. Ludwig AI identifies the correct form as "conducted with".
Frequent in
News & Media
39%
Academia
25%
Science
16%
Less common in
Formal & Business
10%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "conduct with" appears frequently in various sources, including news, academic, and scientific contexts, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that the correct form is "conducted with", which is the past participle. When writing, ensure you use the '-ed' ending to maintain grammatical accuracy. Remember that despite the frequent usage of "conduct with", the use of "conducted with" ensures clarity and correctness.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
conducted with
Adds the -ed ending to "conduct", correcting the grammar and indicating a completed action. This is the grammatically correct form.
perform with
Replaces "conduct" with "perform", offering a synonym with a slightly broader application.
undertake with
Substitutes "conduct" with "undertake", implying a more formal and deliberate action.
manage with
Replaces "conduct" with "manage", focusing on the handling or direction of something.
handle with
Replaces "conduct" with "handle", implying a practical approach to dealing with something.
execute with
Substitutes "conduct" with "execute", focusing on carrying out a plan or task.
implement with
Replaces "conduct" with "implement", suggesting the putting of a plan or system into effect.
administer with
Substitutes "conduct" with "administer", emphasizing the management and organization of something.
oversee with
Replaces "conduct" with "oversee", focusing on the supervision and guidance of an activity.
coordinate with
Substitutes "conduct" with "coordinate", implying that you are organizing a process.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use "conduct with" in a sentence?
The phrase "conduct with" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "conducted with", which is the past participle of "conduct".
What does "conducted with" mean?
"Conducted with" means that an action or activity was carried out using something or in a particular manner. For example, "The experiment was conducted with precision."
Can I use "conduct with" in formal writing?
No, "conduct with" is not appropriate for formal writing because it is grammatically incorrect. Use "conducted with" instead.
What are some alternatives to "conducted with"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "performed with", "executed with", or "carried out with".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested