concurrence by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "concurrence by" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it in contexts where you want to indicate agreement or approval from a specific party or individual. Example: "The project proceeded with the concurrence by the board of directors." Alternative expressions include "agreement from," "approval by," and "consent from."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

FROM THE CONCURRENCE By Justice O'Connor I write separately for two reasons.

The New York Times

FROM THE CONCURRENCE By Justice Thomas Frederick Douglass once said that "education... means emancipation.

The New York Times

Only one, a concurrence by Robert Grier, could be called short.

The New Yorker

FROM THE CONCURRENCE By Justice O'Connor I joined Bowers, and do not join the Court in overruling it.

The New York Times

David Boren, president of the University of Oklahoma, has banned alcohol from dormitories and fraternity houses, subject to concurrence by the Board of Regents.

The New York Times

A concurrence by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg stressed that lower courts were still free to rule that the government's approach did not impinge on religious practice, as many appeals courts have.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., in a part of his concurrence joined by Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas, was skeptical of all of the appeals court's rationales.

The New York Times

The scale was apparently tipped by Justice Antonin Scalia, who joined in parts of the majority opinion, and also in a concurrence written by Justice Breyer.

The New York Times

"The substantial risk of putting an innocent man to death," Justice Stevens wrote in a concurrence joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, "clearly provides an adequate justification for holding an evidentiary hearing".

The New York Times

Justice John Paul Stevens, in a concurrence joined by Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor, said Justice Thomas's "static approach to the law" did not allow for societal progress and would entail unacceptable human consequences.

The New York Times

Justice Scalia, in a concurrence joined by Justice Alito, said the misconduct in the case was the work of a single "miscreant prosecutor," Gerry Deegan, who suppressed evidence "he believed to be exculpatory, in an effort to railroad Thompson".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "concurrence by", ensure that the context is formal or legal, as the term "concurrence" is more frequently used in such settings. For less formal contexts, consider using "agreement by" or "approval by".

Common error

Avoid using "concurrence by" in everyday conversation or informal writing. It can sound overly formal or stilted in such contexts. Opt for simpler alternatives like "agreement from" or "approval by" for better clarity and tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "concurrence by" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun or verb to indicate agreement or approval. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Science

41%

Encyclopedias

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Academia

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "concurrence by" is a grammatically correct and relatively common prepositional phrase used to indicate agreement or approval from a specific entity. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, noting its prevalence in formal contexts such as legal documents, official reports, and academic papers. While versatile, "concurrence by" is most appropriately used in settings that call for a degree of formality; in more casual contexts, alternatives like "agreement by" or "approval by" may be preferable. With its roots in law and government, this phrase lends an air of authority and officialdom to any statement in which it appears.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreement by

Replaces "concurrence" with a more common synonym, maintaining the same structure.

approval by

Substitutes "concurrence" with "approval", emphasizing formal acceptance.

endorsement by

Uses "endorsement" instead of "concurrence", suggesting active support.

ratification by

Implies formal validation, a more official form of agreement.

sanction by

Suggests an authoritative permission or approval.

assent from

Replaces "concurrence" with "assent" and "by" with "from", indicating agreement or compliance.

consent from

Emphasizes permission or voluntary agreement.

permission granted by

Uses a verb phrase to express approval, adding clarity.

validation by

Highlights the act of confirming or substantiating something.

authorization by

Indicates official permission or empowerment.

FAQs

How can I use "concurrence by" in a sentence?

Use "concurrence by" to indicate agreement or approval from a specific entity. For example, "The project proceeded with the concurrence by the board of directors." You can see more examples "here".

What is a good substitute for "concurrence by"?

Good substitutes for "concurrence by" include "agreement by", "approval by", or "endorsement by", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

Is "concurrence by" formal or informal?

"Concurrence by" is considered a formal expression. It is best suited for legal, official, or academic contexts. In more casual settings, alternatives like "agreement by" are more appropriate.

What's the difference between "agreement by" and "concurrence by"?

While both phrases indicate approval, "concurrence by" is more formal and often used in legal or official contexts. "Agreement by" is a more general and widely applicable term.