Ai Feedback
Exact(60)
Increased impact factors and Thomas Reuters citation tracking.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and clinicaltrials.gov up to February 2015, and conducted forward and backward citation tracking.
No further study was retrieved by citation tracking.
We identified relevant studies also by citation tracking.
An additional 37 articles were retrieved via citation tracking.
We also checked references and used citation tracking.
Figure 1 depicts our citation tracking search strategy.
A total of 274 publications were identified via database search and forward citation tracking.
Further publications not indexed in Medline were identified through forward and backward citation tracking.
Relevant outcome measures were identified by searching 8 electronic databases, supplemented by citation tracking.
In a second step, we conducted forward citation tracking (via Scopus and Google Scholar).
Related(20)
appointment tracking
mention tracking
footnote tracking
identification tracking
annotation tracking
referral tracking
breach tracking
reference tracking
term tracking
visa tracking
ticket tracking
references tracking
entry tracking
best tracking
citation count
citation form
citation analysis
citation textbook
citation relevance
citation behavior
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com