charges against

USAGE SUMMARY

"charges against" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is often used to indicate that someone has been accused of committing a crime or wrongdoing. Here are some examples: - The police have filed charges against the suspect in the robbery case. - The company is facing serious charges against its executives for fraud. - The athlete vehemently denies the charges against him of using performance-enhancing drugs. - The prosecutor presented evidence to support the charges against the accused. - The lawyer argued that there was no evidence to support the charges against his client.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Charges against Ms. Pettway followed.

The New York Times

Charges against them are pending.

The New York Times

The three deny all charges against them.

Independent

Tells about the charges against him.

The New Yorker

Both deny all the charges against them.

Independent

He denies all the charges against him.

Independent

The charges against them were then withdrawn.

The Economist

But charges against companies are exceedingly rare.

The New York Times

All deny the charges against them.

Independent

Charges against the guard were dismissed.

The New York Times

Rolf Harris denies the charges against him.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "charges against", ensure you are clear about the specific nature of the accusations and the parties involved. Be precise in your language to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "charges against" without specifying who is bringing the charges and what the charges are. Vague language can lead to confusion or misinterpretation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "charges against" functions as a prepositional phrase that typically modifies a noun or verb, indicating the object of the charges. Ludwig AI shows that it often appears in legal and news contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Wiki

12%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Science

3%

Academia

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "charges against" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to indicate legal accusations or claims. As Ludwig AI highlights, it is frequently found in news and legal contexts, maintaining a neutral register. While alternatives like ""allegations against"" or "indictment of" exist, "charges against" specifically refers to formal legal accusations. When using this phrase, ensure clarity and specify the nature and source of the charges to avoid ambiguity. The phrase is very common, demonstrating its widespread use in conveying information about legal proceedings and accusations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

case against

Refers to the legal arguments and evidence presented.

allegations against

Focuses on the unproven nature of the accusations.

complaints against

Suggests a more informal or less severe accusation.

claims against

Implies assertions that may or may not be true.

accusations leveled at

Highlights the act of making the accusations.

indictment of

Emphasizes a formal legal accusation.

legal action against

Broadly refers to any legal proceedings.

lawsuit against

Specifically refers to a civil legal case.

prosecution of

Focuses on the legal process of pursuing charges.

actions against

Describes steps taken in opposition.

FAQs

How is "charges against" used in a sentence?

The phrase "charges against" is used to indicate that someone is accused of something, especially in a legal context. For example, "The lawyer addressed the "case against" his client" or "The police are investigating the "allegations against" the mayor".

What are some alternatives to "charges against"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "accusations leveled at", "indictment of", or "legal action against".

When is it appropriate to use "charges against" instead of "accusations against"?

"Charges against" is typically used in a legal or formal context when someone has been officially charged with a crime. "Accusations against" is a broader term that can refer to any kind of claim or allegation, whether or not it has been formally brought before a court.

Can "charges against" be dropped or dismissed?

Yes, "charges against" someone can be dropped or dismissed if there is insufficient evidence, procedural errors, or other legal reasons. In such cases, the individual is no longer subject to the legal proceedings related to those specific charges. Many examples prove that this is true like: "The "charges against" him were later dropped".