Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

allegations against

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "allegations against" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that someone is accused of something. For example: "The newspaper released an article containing allegations against the Prime Minister for taking bribes."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mr Metzger denies the allegations against him.

News & Media

Independent

They deny the allegations against them.

News & Media

Independent

Regardless, the allegations against McInnis are troubling.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Mr Clarke denies all allegations against him.

News & Media

Independent

Karpe does not dispute the allegations against him.

Official allegations against him are well known.

It was about Barry's allegations against us".

Zardari denied all allegations against him.

News & Media

The Guardian

All denied the allegations against them.

News & Media

The Guardian

"The allegations against Venezuela are clear.

News & Media

The Guardian

CD denies the allegations against him.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Clearly identify the source of the allegations to provide context and allow readers to assess the credibility of the claims.

Common error

Avoid phrasing that implies guilt when discussing "allegations against" someone. Use neutral language to maintain objectivity until there is sufficient evidence.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "allegations against" functions as a noun phrase acting as the object of a verb or preposition. It typically indicates the existence of unproven claims directed towards an individual, group, or entity. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "allegations against" is a commonly used and grammatically correct way to describe accusations that have not yet been proven. As Ludwig AI indicates, its use is appropriate across various contexts, though it is most frequently found in news and media, academic, and legal settings. When using this phrase, it's essential to maintain neutrality and avoid implying guilt before evidence is presented. Alternatives such as "accusations leveled at" or "claims made regarding" can provide nuanced variations, but "allegations against" remains a direct and widely understood expression for unproven claims.

FAQs

How can I use "allegations against" in a sentence?

You can use "allegations against" to describe accusations that have been made but not yet proven. For example, "The company is facing serious "allegations against" its CEO."

What are some alternatives to "allegations against"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "accusations leveled at", "charges brought against", or "claims made regarding".

Is it appropriate to use "allegations against" in formal writing?

Yes, "allegations against" is suitable for formal writing, especially in legal, journalistic, and academic contexts, as it is a clear and neutral way to refer to unproven claims.

What is the difference between "allegations against" and "convictions of"?

"Allegations against" refers to unproven accusations, while "convictions of" refers to proven guilt in a court of law. The former implies a claim, while the latter indicates a judgment.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: