cast with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cast with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the selection of actors for a role in a film, play, or other performance. Example: "The movie was cast with some of the most talented actors in the industry."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was an amazing cast with Terrence Howard.

Independent

Twelve pretensioned concrete beams were cast with high-strength concrete.

Engineering Structures

Rob Ruggiero has directed the cast with energy and wit.

The New York Times

Cast with an ingenue, the movie would become merely salacious.

The New York Times

It has a young cast with a lot of newcomers.

The New York Times - Arts

"But he had a great cast with him".

The New York Times - Sports

The studwork was then cast with a hemp lime composite.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Directed by Visiting MLK Artist Ricardo Pitts-Wiley and cast with MIT students.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The study is comparing concretes and cement pastes cast with either blended cement or Portland cement.

Construction and Building Materials

In this paper, we extend CAST with a decision-making module.

Decision Support Systems

Like Amajuba, Nirbhaya will be cast with performers who recount their own testimonies.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "cast with" when referring to the selection of actors for a theatrical production, film, or television show. It can also be used more broadly to describe the inclusion of elements in a system or structure.

Common error

Avoid using "cast with" when a simpler verb like "include" or "contain" would be more appropriate. For example, instead of saying "The report was cast with errors", use "The report contained errors".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cast with" primarily functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, indicating the action of selecting or assigning individuals (especially actors) to roles. Ludwig AI shows numerous examples where it describes the composition of a group or a production's actors.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Science

27%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "cast with" is a common and grammatically sound expression primarily used to describe the selection of actors for a production. As demonstrated by Ludwig AI, it's frequently found in news and media, science, and academic contexts. While versatile, it's important to use it appropriately, avoiding misuse in non-theatrical contexts where a simpler verb might be more suitable. Remember to consider alternative phrases like "filled with" or "composed of" depending on the intended meaning. Paying attention to these nuances will ensure clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

populated with

Focuses on the idea of filling something with a specific group.

filled with

Emphasizes the completeness of the filling action.

staffed with

Highlights the presence of personnel.

composed of

Indicates the constituents of a group or collection.

assembled with

Suggests a deliberate gathering of elements.

outfitted with

Implies equipping something with necessary items.

provided with

Highlights the act of supplying something.

equipped with

Focuses on providing the necessary tools or features.

furnished with

Implies the addition of decorative or functional elements.

laden with

Suggests a heavy or abundant filling.

FAQs

How is "cast with" used in a sentence?

The phrase "cast with" is used to describe the actors chosen for a play, movie, or show, or more broadly to describe elements included in something. For example, "The film was "cast with" renowned actors".

What are some alternatives to using "cast with"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "populated with", "filled with", or "staffed with".

When is it appropriate to use "cast with" versus "filled with"?

"Cast with" is typically used when referring to actors in a production. "Filled with", on the other hand, is more general and can be used to describe anything that is full of something. For example, "The theater was "filled with" excitement".

Is there a difference between using "cast with" and "composed of"?

"Cast with" implies a selection process, especially for theatrical roles. "Composed of" is used to describe the constituents of something, without necessarily implying a selection. For example, "The team was "composed of" members from various departments".