burden for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "burden for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate the responsibility or onus assumed by someone in a particular situation. For example: "The CEO of the company took on the burden for finding a new supplier for the raw materials."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Yet another burden for these beleaguered folks.

The New York Times

That's an unfair burden for beneficiaries".

The New York Times

Others were beasts of burden for villagers.

The New York Times

That's a burden for anyone to carry".

The Guardian - Sport

But isn't organic a burden for farmers?

The Guardian

You're just exchanging one burden for another.

The Washington Post

Servicing this debt is becoming a bigger burden for Ford.

The New York Times

But monitoring these camps poses a fiscal burden for states.

The New York Times

"The biggest burden for us is business rates.

The Guardian - Business

It is an onerous burden for Mr. Parsons.

The New York Times

This is all a burden for the younger actors here.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "burden for", consider whether a more specific term like "responsibility", "liability", or "strain" might better convey your intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "burden for" when describing situations where the entity is actually benefiting. Ensure the "burden" is genuinely experienced as a disadvantage or hardship.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "burden for" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun to indicate something that creates difficulty, hardship, or obligation. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "burden for" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that something creates difficulty, hardship, or responsibility. Ludwig AI confirms this and highlights its frequent appearance across diverse domains, including news, academia, and business. While the phrase is generally neutral, it often implies a negative impact. When using "burden for", it's crucial to ensure that the described situation genuinely presents a disadvantage. Alternatives like "responsibility for", "liability for", and "strain on" offer more specific ways to convey related meanings. By understanding these nuances, writers can effectively and accurately communicate the weight or difficulty associated with a particular situation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

responsibility for

Focuses on the obligation or duty rather than the weight or difficulty implied by "burden".

liability for

Emphasizes legal or financial accountability, a more specific type of "burden".

onus for

Highlights the duty or task of proving something or taking action.

pressure on

Shifts the focus to the stress or strain experienced due to expectations or demands.

strain on

Emphasizes the adverse effect on resources, relationships, or systems.

challenge for

Presents the situation as a difficult but potentially rewarding task.

weight on

Focuses on the emotional or psychological impact of a difficult situation.

drawback for

Highlights the disadvantages or negative aspects associated with something.

hindrance to

Focuses on what obstructs or impedes progress.

impediment to

Indicates a more formal or significant obstacle.

FAQs

How is "burden for" typically used in a sentence?

The phrase "burden for" is used to indicate something that causes difficulty, hardship, or responsibility for a person, organization, or entity. For example, "The cost of healthcare can be a significant "burden for" families".

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "burden for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "responsibility for", "liability for", "onus for", or "strain on". The best choice will depend on the nuance you wish to convey.

Which is correct: "burden for" or "burden on"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Burden for" suggests responsibility or difficulty towards someone, while "burden on" suggests a pressure or strain affecting someone. For example, "The debt is a burden for the company" versus "The debt is a burden on the company's resources."

What's the difference between saying something is a "burden for" someone versus saying it is a "responsibility of" someone?

While both phrases indicate a weight or obligation, "burden for" often implies a negative impact or hardship, whereas "responsibility of" is more neutral and simply indicates a duty. A "responsibility of" may not necessarily be perceived as negative, while a "burden for" typically is.