liability for

USAGE SUMMARY

"liability for" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used when referring to someone's responsibility for a particular thing or action. For example: "Each company has its own policy when it comes to liability for employees' mistakes."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Germany rejects liability for others.

The Economist

§ 767.17 Liability for damages.

Cornell University

Licensee's liability for payment.

Cornell University

Barclays avoided liability for most of it.

The New York Times

Christian Eriksen is the liability for Tottenham.

Independent

Liability for murder "does not expire".

The Economist

§ 3.76 Licensee's liability for payment.

Cornell University

Vicarious Liability for Infringing Performances.

Cornell University

Protection from Liability for Monitoring.

Harvard University

Environmental Research Letters, May 2015"Liability for climate change".

The Economist

*Strict liability for players who test positive.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "liability for" to precisely assign responsibility in contracts, agreements, and legal documents, ensuring each party understands their obligations.

Common error

Do not use "liability for" without specifying who is liable and for what. Always clarify the specific actions or circumstances that trigger liability to avoid confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "liability for" functions as a prepositional phrase that typically follows a noun or verb to specify the scope or subject of responsibility. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

34%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "liability for" is a common prepositional phrase used to assign responsibility. According to Ludwig AI, it's grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts. Its primary function is to clarify accountability, particularly in legal, business, and news-related discussions. The phrase is most frequently found in News & Media and Academic writing, indicating a neutral to formal register. When using "liability for", clarity is key; specify who is liable and for what to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "responsibility for" or "accountability for" based on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

responsibility for

Indicates a general duty or obligation to handle something.

accountability for

Highlights the obligation to answer for outcomes or actions.

legal responsibility for

Specifically denotes a responsibility recognized by law.

culpability for

Refers specifically to blameworthiness or guilt for a wrongdoing.

blame for

Assigns direct responsibility for a negative outcome.

obligation for

Implies a legal or moral duty to fulfill a requirement.

exposure to

Indicates the state of being subject to something, often negative.

risk of

Emphasizes the potential for a negative outcome or event.

burden of

Highlights the onerous or difficult nature of a responsibility.

onus of

Similar to "burden of", emphasizing the weight of responsibility.

FAQs

How is "liability for" used in legal contexts?

In legal contexts, "liability for" is used to assign legal responsibility for damages, injuries, or other harms. It's crucial in contracts, tort law, and criminal law to determine who is accountable for specific actions or outcomes. For example, a company might have "liability for product defects" that cause injury.

What are some alternatives to "liability for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "responsibility for", "accountability for", or "culpability for". Each alternative carries slightly different connotations, so choose the one that best fits the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "liability for" and "responsibility for"?

"Liability for" often implies a legal or financial obligation, while "responsibility for" is a broader term that can encompass moral, ethical, or practical duties. You might have responsibility for a project's success, but liability for the damages if it fails due to negligence.

How can I clarify the scope of "liability for" in a contract?

To clarify the scope of "liability for" in a contract, precisely define the events or actions that trigger liability, the parties who are liable, and the extent of the damages or remedies. Using specific language avoids ambiguity and potential disputes. For instance, the contract may state that the contractor assumes "liability for any damages" caused by their subcontractors.