broader enough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "broader enough" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the adequacy of a concept, idea, or scope in terms of its width or inclusiveness. Example: "The definition provided is not broader enough to encompass all the variations of the term."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

What if Bush's emotional range had been just slightly broader, enough to get him past fuddy-duddy anguish and to dignified outrage?

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

More important, they are not broad enough.

The New York Times

The law is certainly broad enough.

The New York Times

Does dance attract a broad enough audience?

The Guardian

But are his shoulders broad enough?

The New York Times - Sports

It's broad enough to encompass Arthur Ashe, Mike Tyson and Kobe Bryant.

The New York Times

Like him, but perhaps not broad enough in his appeal.

The New York Times

The MDGs were broad enough to allow local variation.

The Economist

This trio's shoulders are broad enough to bear it.

The Guardian

The wine list is broad enough and reasonably priced.

The Guardian - Travel

"My shoulders are broad enough and my skin thick enough to take this," he said.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "broader enough", ensure the context clearly defines what aspect needs to be wider or more inclusive. For example, "The definition isn't broader enough to include edge cases."

Common error

Avoid using "broader enough" when "broader" or "wide enough" suffices. The addition of "enough" can sometimes make the phrase unnecessarily wordy in straightforward situations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "broader enough" functions as an adjectival modifier, describing the extent or scope of something. It questions whether something is sufficiently inclusive or comprehensive, aligning with the examples provided by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "broader enough" is a grammatically correct but infrequent phrase used to question the adequacy of something's scope. Ludwig AI confirms its usability, though it's advisable to consider more common alternatives like "sufficiently broad" or "wide enough" for clarity. Predominantly found in news and media contexts, its neutral register makes it versatile for various writing styles. While grammatically sound, ensure its use isn't redundant and that the context clearly defines what needs to be wider or more inclusive.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficiently broad

Emphasizes sufficiency in breadth, replacing "enough" with a more formal synonym.

wide enough

Uses "wide" as a direct synonym for "broad", maintaining the core meaning.

extensive enough

Suggests a breadth that covers a large area or scope, similar to "broad".

large enough in scope

Explicitly specifies "scope", clarifying the area of breadth being discussed.

adequately broad

Replaces "enough" with "adequately", focusing on the satisfactory level of breadth.

sufficiently comprehensive

Emphasizes completeness as well as breadth, indicating a thorough coverage.

sufficient in its breadth

Inverts the structure to emphasize sufficiency and uses a more formal tone.

of adequate breadth

Puts breadth as the subject of the phrase

expansive enough

Suggests a capability for great extension

with sufficient breadth

Uses a prepositional phrase to indicate the presence of enough breadth.

FAQs

What does "broader enough" mean?

The phrase "broader enough" suggests that something needs to be more encompassing or inclusive. It questions whether the current scope or perspective is sufficiently wide to cover all necessary aspects or elements.

How can I use "broader enough" in a sentence?

You can use "broader enough" to critique the scope of a concept, argument, or perspective. For example, "Is the definition "sufficiently broad" to include all potential cases?" or "The policy isn't "comprehensive enough" to address the underlying issues."

What are some alternatives to "broader enough"?

Alternatives to "broader enough" include "sufficiently broad", "wide enough", or "extensive enough". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "broader enough" grammatically correct?

Yes, "broader enough" is grammatically correct. It follows the standard English construction of using an adjective followed by "enough" to indicate sufficiency. However, ensure it fits contextually and isn't redundant.