Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
After every selection round the results of both reviewers were compared and disagreements were discussed.
To deal with the apparent subjectivity of the process, the themes identified by both reviewers were compared and discrepancies were discussed.
After the initial screening of titles and abstracts, the studies included by both reviewers were compared; disagreement was resolved by consensus.
MRI gradings of both reviewers were compared to our arthroscopic findings, and weighted kappa values for multiple categories were calculated (Table 1).
The MRI grading of both reviewers were compared to arthroscopic findings (Table 2), showing an exact agreement in 78% (186 of 240) and 76% (182 of 240) of the joint surfaces.
Similar(55)
The results of the two reviewers were compared, and any disagreements were resolved by discussion.
To estimate validity, the VA diagnoses made by the two reviewers were compared to the gold standard diagnoses and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and kappa statistics were calculated for each reviewer-gold standard comparison.
The extraction results of the two reviewers were compared.
The four reviewers were compared to each other in regards to the scoring of BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry.
Soon enough, reviewers were comparing him to Amis, Evelyn Waugh, Ring Lardner, and Max Beerbohm immensely gratifying judgments and helpful publisher's blurbs, but somehow less than apt.
Mr. Spielberg has said that he first heard about Tintin in 1983, when he learned that French reviewers were comparing his "Raiders of the Lost Ark" to some of Hergé's work.
Related(20)
both reviewers were combined
both examiners were compared
both ears were compared
both reviewers were entered
both questionnaires were compared
both sources were compared
both reviewers were classified
both ratings were compared
both angles were compared
both strains were compared
both systems were compared
both approaches were compared
both scores were compared
both results were compared
both reviewers were contacted
both interventions were compared
both configurations were compared
both processes were compared
both muscles were compared
both instruments were compared
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com