Sentence examples for both angles were compared from inspiring English sources

Both angles were compared in terms of reliability, reproducibility, and precision.

The calculated geometrical parameters (bond lengths and bond angles) were compared with available experimental data [13].

Coefficients of friction during tests at distinct torsion angles were compared.

The planned wedge angles were compared with the measured wedge angles and the differences are found to be less than 2° throughout the range of field sizes.

Various types of torsional performance (i.e., first-cracking torque, ultimate torque, and twist angles) were compared experimentally to evaluate the performance of the RC beam specimens.

Data obtained at 6-hourly intervals (IBP, LIAP and UIAP at supine and 30° head of bed angles) were compared by means of a Bland and Altman analysis [30].

The CME tilt angles and MC fitted axis angles were compared without taking into account handedness of the underlying flux rope field and the polarity of its axial field.

When indentation responses from 2-D wedge indenters with different included angles were compared, the data showed evidence that this indentation size effect depended on the included wedge angle.

When flip angles were compared, image SNR (based on muscle signal) was approximately equal between flip angles, ranging from 20 to 23 (Figure 2).

Categories for fit and categories for hallux angles were compared by Chi-square tests.

Analysed RVG features including vascular widths and branching angles were compared between patient cohorts.