Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
Firstly the questions and domains in both instruments were compared.
Results of both instruments were compared by statistical analyses using Spearman's rank correlations.
The durations of examination (in seconds) obtained with both instruments were compared.
Since both instruments were compared in the absence of an objective biomarker of TFI, this is a relative comparison.
The groups' knowledge test scores with both instruments were compared with one-way analysis of variance, with planned comparisons.
Both instruments were compared and the SMPS size distribution was recalculated to the UFP 3,031 size bins.
Similar(52)
The predictive validity of both instruments was compared using an optimal cut-off score of ≥2 for the RISC and ≥5 for the CFS, based upon the sensitivity and specificity, calculated a priori, from the ROC curves.
In addition, two different measurement instruments were compared; namely, a vector network analyzer and a time-domain reflectometer.
The colour values from the VNIR instruments were compared with reference values collected from three Minolta instruments designed specifically to measure colour.
The data from the three instruments were compared during a study of drifting snow within an Arctic catchment and around a building.
However, critics noted that only six instruments were compared; the players were not top-flight soloists; and the test was conducted in a hotel room, close quarters that should make any violin sounds vibrant.
Related(20)
both devices were compared
both protocols were compared
both methods were compared
both tests were compared
both technologies were compared
both questionnaires were compared
both lungs were compared
both sources were compared
both structures were compared
both types were compared
both instruments were administered
both materials were compared
both instruments were affected
both ratings were compared
both angles were compared
both systems were compared
both approaches were compared
both instruments were approved
both instruments were selected
both processes were compared
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com