blatant irregularities

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "blatant irregularities" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe obvious or conspicuous discrepancies or violations, often in contexts such as audits, investigations, or reports. Example: "The audit revealed blatant irregularities in the financial statements that could not be overlooked."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Despite a few blatant irregularities, voters decisively endorsed the new constitution, which establishes a parliamentary republic and takes power away from the presidency.

The Economist

The Japanese ambassador, Yoshizo Konishi, had a long meeting today with Mr. Stein, who has been criticizing what he sees as blatant irregularities in the vote count.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

My delegation witnessed and documented widespread election irregularities including blatant vote buying, intimidation of voters and observers, massive voter disenfranchisement, and anomalies in vote tabulation for large blocks of the country, all of which resulted in the consolidation of power by the National Party and the unfair defeat of the opposition.

Huffington Post

He also reported "blatant fraud" in Bashkortostan Republic, in the southern Urals, and "irregularities" in Siberia and the Far East.

The New York Times

The latter has suffered a blatant coup; the former has seen merely a series of elections with, ahem, irregularities.

The Economist

Blatant distortions.

The New York Times

"Blatant ballot-stuffing".

The New Yorker

Some were so blatant.

The New York Times

This is blatant discrimination.

The New York Times

The hypocrisy is blatant.

The New York Times

Blats booted to blatant.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "blatant irregularities" to describe situations where the irregularities are not only present but also very obvious and easily noticeable. This phrase is stronger than simply saying "irregularities".

Common error

While "blatant irregularities" is acceptable in many contexts, avoid using it excessively in highly formal or academic writing where more neutral language might be preferred. Consider alternatives like "significant discrepancies" or "notable inconsistencies".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "blatant irregularities" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or the subject of a sentence. It describes specific instances of non-compliance that are easily noticeable. As supported by Ludwig, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "blatant irregularities" is a phrase used to describe clear and obvious deviations from established rules or standards. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While infrequent overall, it's primarily found in news and media contexts, emphasizing the conspicuous nature of the discrepancies. Alternatives include phrases like "obvious discrepancies" and "flagrant violations", each carrying slightly different connotations. When using this phrase, consider the formality of the context and whether a more neutral term might be more appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obvious discrepancies

Focuses on the clear and easily noticeable nature of the inconsistencies.

flagrant violations

Emphasizes the open and scandalous nature of the violations.

glaring anomalies

Highlights the striking and unusual nature of the deviations.

overt inconsistencies

Focuses on the undisguised and apparent nature of the inconsistencies.

plainly evident errors

Highlights the clear and unmistakable nature of the errors.

conspicuous improprieties

Emphasizes the striking and inappropriate nature of the actions.

unmistakable flaws

Focuses on the clear and easily identifiable defects.

patent abnormalities

Highlights the obvious and unusual nature of the deviations.

visible distortions

Focuses on the clear and easily perceptible alterations.

palpable errors

Highlights errors that are easily perceived or obvious.

FAQs

How to use "blatant irregularities" in a sentence?

You can use "blatant irregularities" to describe situations where something is clearly not right or in accordance with the rules. For example, "The audit revealed "blatant irregularities" in the company's financial records".

What can I say instead of "blatant irregularities"?

You can use alternatives like "obvious discrepancies", "flagrant violations", or "glaring anomalies" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "blatant irregularities" or "obvious irregularities"?

Both "blatant irregularities" and "obvious irregularities" are correct, but "blatant" suggests a higher degree of conspicuousness and impropriety than "obvious". "Blatant irregularities" often imply intentional wrongdoing, whereas obvious irregularities may simply indicate errors.

What is the difference between "irregularities" and "blatant irregularities"?

"Irregularities" refers to deviations from what is standard or expected. Adding "blatant" emphasizes that these deviations are very obvious and conspicuous. Using "blatant irregularities" suggests a greater degree of concern and possible intent.