Ai Feedback
Exact(12)
No significant associations between snacking frequency and visceral fat were apparent.
The objective of this study was to investigate the associations between snacking frequency and detailed adiposity measurements.
These were included as covariates in an attempt to rule out confounding by food type in the association between snacking frequency and adiposity.
A priori, we tested for interaction between snacking frequency and each of BMI (<25 or ≥25 kg/m) and PAEE (< or ≥median: 51·7 kJ/kg per d), in relation to body composition measures.
Our approach to analysis was rigorous, as we investigated possible under-reporting, intentional dieting and interaction by BMI and PAEE, allowing us to account for and exclude many alternative explanations for an association between snacking frequency and adiposity.
Further adjustment (model 2) attenuated the association with body fat percentage in men to null.> -wrap-foot> There was no significant interaction between snacking frequency and PAEE (P<0·05) on any body composition measure in men or women.
Similar(48)
Associations between snacking frequency (per unit difference) and body composition were examined using multiple linear regression models.
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between self-defined snacking frequency and adiposity measures among adult men and women.
The analyses were adjusted for frequency of consumption of other meal types to assess the independent association of snacking frequency and measures of adiposity.
A total of 10 092 adults residing in Cambridgeshire, England, self-completed eating pattern snacking frequency, FFQ and physical activity questionnaires.
Adjustments were made for sex, toothbrushing frequency, use of fluoride, regular dental check-ups, between-meal snack frequency, breastfeeding duration, paternal and maternal educational levels, maternal smoking during pregnancy, and secondhand smoke exposure at home.
Related(20)
between headache frequency and
between isolation frequency and
between farming frequency and
between integration frequency and
between attack frequency and
between seizure frequency and
between docking frequency and
between exacerbation frequency and
between cough frequency and
between sporulation frequency and
between communication frequency and
between band frequency and
between resonance frequency and
between defoliation frequency and
between load frequency and
between carbonaria frequency and
between methylation frequency and
between interaction frequency and
between screening frequency and
between lightning frequency and
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com