Ai Feedback
Exact(8)
Differences between genotypes were compared using Students t-tests.
Differences in the distribution of inter-IPSC intervals between genotypes were compared using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, with significance set at P<0.05.
Mean expression values between genotypes were compared using a t-test (P≤0.05).
Differences in categorical variables (sex, ethnic group, smoking, and supplement use) between genotypes were compared by using chi-square tests.
Differences between genotypes were compared statistically using Student's t-tests with a P-value of ≤ 0.05 considered as statistically significant.
The median ages between genotypes were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test and did not reach statistical significance (P < 0.05) in the case of GSDMB.
Similar(52)
The TPF data between the genotypes were compared by using PROC TTEST.
Differences in body temperature, and microglia and astrocytes staining between the different genotypes were compared by two-way ANOVA with treatment and genotype as between-subjects factors of variation, followed by one-way ANOVA and subsequent post hoc analysis (Tukey's test).
The differences between treatments and genotypes were compared using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) least significant difference test at the 5% probability level.
Genotypes were compared between normal adjacent tissue and matched tumor samples; informative loci were those that were heterozygous in the normal tissue.
Genotypes were compared between cases and controls.
Related(20)
between genotypes were evaluated
between genotypes were assessed
between genotypes were explored
between genders were compared
between means were compared
between studies were compared
between sites were compared
between genotypes were made
between years were compared
between genotypes were studied
between genotypes were detected
between genotypes were assigned
between genotypes were involved
between areas were compared
between arms were compared
between variables were compared
between genotypes were analysed
between genotypes were represented
between activities were compared
between genotypes were tested
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com