Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

believed to have

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'believed to have' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to something that may or may not have happened in the past, but is generally accepted as true. Example: Galileo is believed to have first demonstrated that the earth revolves around the sun.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He is believed to have died immediately.

News & Media

Independent

Chilis are believed to have health benefits.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Mr. Awlaki is believed to have survived.

News & Media

The New York Times

Apple is widely believed to have both.

(Leon Trotsky was believed to have rented it).

Chocolate is believed to have antioxidant effects.

Curtis is believed to have sent letters….

News & Media

The New Yorker

Kempny is believed to have a concussion.

He was believed to have been 95.

Tarrant is believed to have a sister.

News & Media

The Guardian

He is believed to have been killed.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "believed to have" when you want to convey that something is generally accepted as true, but without definitive proof. This is useful in historical accounts, scientific discussions, and news reporting where certainty is not possible.

Common error

Avoid using "believed to have" when there is concrete evidence available. In such cases, use more assertive language to reflect the factual basis of the statement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "believed to have" functions as an epistemic marker, indicating a degree of uncertainty or a lack of definitive proof regarding a past event or state. It suggests that a proposition is generally accepted but not conclusively verified, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Academia

20%

Science

16%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "believed to have" is a versatile phrase used to express a generally held belief without definitive proof. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's grammatically sound and common across various contexts, particularly in news, academic writing, and scientific discussions. While alternatives like "thought to have" or "presumed to have" can offer nuanced variations, "believed to have" remains a reliable and widely understood option. Be mindful of overstating certainty and avoid using it when stronger evidence is available.

FAQs

How can I use "believed to have" in a sentence?

You can use "believed to have" to express that something is generally accepted as true, even without definitive proof. For example, "The artifact is "believed to have" originated from ancient Egypt."

What are some alternatives to "believed to have"?

Some alternatives include "thought to have", "considered to have", or "presumed to have", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "believed to had" instead of "believed to have"?

No, "believed to had" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""believed to have"", where "have" is part of the infinitive form.

What's the difference between "believed to have" and "known to have"?

"Believed to have" indicates a generally held belief without concrete proof, while "known to have" implies that there is solid evidence to support the statement.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: