be less efficient for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be less efficient for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a situation or condition where something is not performing at its optimal level for a specific purpose or context. Example: "Using outdated software can cause the system to be less efficient for processing large datasets."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

At irreducible water saturation, the process appeared to be less efficient for the oil-wet conditions, while similar oil recoveries are observed for both oil-wet and water-wet media at residual oil saturation.

Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

Given that conflict detection should be less efficient for young adolescents, we predict that any possible confidence decrease after solving conflict problems with adults or late adolescents should be absent (or less clear at least) in early adolescents.

Plosone

Thus, like FPLV vaccines for CPV infection, CPV-2a/2b-based vaccines may be less efficient for FPLV infection, which would be a major concern.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

While specific patients require other organizational models, the co-existence of different organizational models for out-of-hours care in a country may be less efficient for health systems.

BMC Health Services Research

Although random library screening followed by PCR amplification and Gateway cloning is an excellent method to clone ORFs corresponding to more than half of the well-defined RefSeq predictions, this approach would be less efficient for the identification of "rare" ORFs.

Genomics

Altogether, we report the identification and functional characterization of the gene, SlGOMT1 that efficiently catalyzes veratrole formation, whereas another copy of this gene with only one amino acid difference, SlGOMT2 was found to be less efficient for veratrole synthesis in S. latifolia.

BMC Plant Biology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

The STORM model corrections are less efficient for lower-middle latitudes and severe geomagnetic storms.

Advances in Space Research

Thirdly, the cooperative strategy is less efficient for targets with larger spacecraft mass.

Advances in Space Research

In contrast, crossing controls is less efficient for estimating a slope parameter for the treatment effect.

Controlled Clinical Trials

Similar scientific sessions, although without the arts workshops, were less efficient for the older age group (Secondary School students).

Journal of Applied Volcanology

Cocktails TR1 and TR4 were less efficient for xylose release which attained respectively 48.7 ± 3.2 % and 46.3 ± 0.3%% respectively.

AMB Express

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be less efficient for", ensure you clearly specify what the subject is less efficient for. This adds clarity and context to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "be less efficient" without specifying the task, goal, or situation. This omission creates ambiguity and weakens the statement. Always clarify what something is less efficient for.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be less efficient for" functions as a comparative descriptor, indicating that a subject performs a specific task or operates within a particular context with reduced efficiency. Ludwig AI confirms this aligns with typical usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "be less efficient for" is used to express that something performs with reduced effectiveness or productivity in a specific context. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and can be used in your writing. This phrase is most commonly found in scientific and academic contexts. When employing this phrase, ensure you clearly state the specific task or goal for which something is less efficient to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "be less effective for" and "be more inefficient for" can provide similar meanings with slightly different nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be less effective for

Replaces "efficient" with "effective", focusing on the degree to which something achieves a desired result rather than the resource expenditure.

be more inefficient for

Uses the antonym "inefficient", offering a direct contrast in terms of resource usage and productivity.

be suboptimal for

Indicates that something is not the best choice or solution in a given context.

be poorly suited for

Highlights the unsuitability of something for a particular purpose or situation.

be unsuited to

A more concise way of expressing that something is inappropriate or incompatible.

be less productive for

Emphasizes the reduction in output or results achieved.

be a hindrance to

Suggests that something actively impedes progress or effectiveness.

not be conducive to

Indicates that something does not create favorable conditions for a particular outcome.

fail to optimize

Focuses on the lack of optimization for a specific purpose.

be counterproductive for

Implies that something has the opposite of the intended effect.

FAQs

How can I use "be less efficient for" in a sentence?

Use "be less efficient for" to indicate that something performs worse in a specific situation or task compared to another. For example, "This method might "be less efficient for" large datasets".

What are some alternatives to "be less efficient for"?

Alternatives include "be less effective for", "be more inefficient for", or "be suboptimal for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "be less efficient for"?

Yes, "be less efficient for" is grammatically correct. It follows standard English sentence structure.

What does it mean when something is described as "less efficient for" something else?

It means that, when used for the stated purpose, its performance is worse in comparison to alternatives in terms of resource usage, time, or overall productivity.