be less effective for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "be less effective for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the diminished effectiveness of something in relation to a specific context or situation. Example: "The new marketing strategy may be less effective for reaching younger audiences compared to traditional methods."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

47 human-written examples

However, the add-on effects of aripiprazole in reversing antipsychotic-induced HPRL depend on the pharmacological properties of the pre-existing antipsychotic; adjunctive aripiprazole treatment reverses effectively HPRL induced by risperidone and olanzapine, but seems to be less effective for that induced by benzamide antipsychotics (amisulpride and sulpiride) [ 226, 233].

CNS Drugs

That model may be less effective for a governor, however, who technically runs a sprawling bureaucracy with tens of thousands of employees and dozens of agencies and departments.

The New York Times

A product that works well for some employees and managers may also be less effective for others, depending on the variety of work styles and culture within an organization.

The Guardian - Business

This suggests that while glitzy female role models sound like a good idea, they can actually be less effective for improving women's confidence than a simple "any person can do this" approach.

The Guardian

While a recent study suggested that these drugs might be less effective for black patients than for white patients, Dr. Klapholz emphasized, "It would be incorrect to say that black patients should not take ACE inhibitors".

The New York Times - Health

However, this procedure turned out to be less effective for videos shot under daylight conditions.

Earth, Planets and Space

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

12 human-written examples

However, this approach was less effective for predicting the sublethal effects of the effluents (Alabaster et al. 1994).

Environmental Health Perspectives

The audit model is less effective for detecting age bias.

The New York Times

Those companies can use their size to offer distributors cash rebates and other incentives to sell their products, tactics that are less effective for the smaller Coors.

The New York Times

According to conventional wisdom, nicotine replacement aids are less effective for women, and women are more fearful of gaining weight after quitting.

The New York Times

Binding was less effective for control microsomes.

Biochemical Pharmacology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "be less effective for", clearly specify the context or the group for whom the subject is less effective. For example, "This treatment may "be less effective for" patients with advanced stages of the disease".

Common error

Avoid overgeneralization when using "be less effective for". Ensure your statement accurately reflects the limitations, specifying the situations or populations where the effectiveness is reduced, not completely absent.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "be less effective for" functions as a comparative adjective phrase, describing a diminished level of efficacy in relation to a specific context or subject. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is grammatically sound and frequently used. Examples show it clarifying circumstances where something's impact is reduced.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

68%

News & Media

22%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "be less effective for" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate a reduced level of efficacy in specific contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage across various domains. When using this phrase, it's important to clearly define the context or target group to avoid overgeneralizations. Alternatives like "be less impactful on" or "be less beneficial to" can provide nuanced variations in meaning. Remember to specify the conditions where the reduced effectiveness is observed to maintain clarity and accuracy in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

be less impactful on

Replaces "effective" with "impactful" focusing on the degree of influence exerted.

be less beneficial to

Substitutes "effective" with "beneficial" highlighting the advantages gained.

be less advantageous for

Replaces "effective" with "advantageous", emphasizing the competitive edge provided.

be less useful to

Replaces "effective" with "useful", pointing out a lower level of usability.

be less successful in

Replaces "effective" with "successful" focusing on the attainment of desired outcomes.

have a reduced effect on

Changes the structure to focus on the reduction of an effect.

not be as potent for

Replaces "effective" with "potent" which refers to the strength of something.

be of limited value to

Emphasizes the limited value or worth in a specific situation.

be weakened for

Highlights the weakening of an action, influence, or effect.

lose efficacy for

Focuses on the loss of the ability to produce a desired or intended result.

FAQs

How can I use "be less effective for" in a sentence?

Use "be less effective for" to indicate that something has a reduced impact or success in a specific situation or with a particular group. For instance, "This strategy might "be less effective for" younger audiences".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "be less effective for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "be less impactful on", "be less beneficial to", or "be less useful to", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "be less effective on" instead of "be less effective for"?

While "on" can sometimes be used, "for" is generally preferred when specifying the group or context where the reduced effectiveness is observed. "On" might be suitable when referring to a surface or direct target, but "for" is better for indicating a specific population or situation.

What's the difference between "be less effective for" and "not be effective for"?

"Be less effective for" implies a reduced level of effectiveness, while "not be effective for" suggests a complete lack of effectiveness. The former indicates that something still has some positive impact, while the latter implies that it has none in a particular context.