at languages

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "at languages" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear in what context it could be used, as it lacks grammatical structure and clarity. Example: "I excel at languages" would be a correct usage.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

I am terrible at languages.

The New York Times

He is — everyone knows — feeble at languages".

The New York Times

And how good are you at languages?

The Guardian - Money

I was a disaster at languages at school.

The Guardian

Here's a confession before we start: I'm good at languages.

The Guardian

Then a great professor said to me: "You're good at languages.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

25 human-written examples

It was also common at language schools.

The New York Times

At Language, 238 Mulberry Street.

The New York Times - Magazine

Harriette Hobbs is client director at language specialists Stratton Craig.

The Guardian

His mother teaches English as a second language at Language ETC, a nonprofit organization in Washington.

The New York Times - Style

I find it interesting to look at language itself and think about what language can do.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing someone's ability with languages, use prepositions like "in" or "with" instead of "at" for grammatical correctness.

Common error

Do not use the preposition "at" to describe proficiency in languages. Instead, use "in" or "with". For example, say "skilled in languages" instead of "skilled at languages".

Linguistic Context

The phrase is intended to describe someone's ability or skill related to languages. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the preposition "at" is not grammatically correct in this context. Correct alternatives include "in languages" or "with languages".

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "at languages" is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI indicates, the accurate prepositions to use are "in" or "with" when describing someone's proficiency. Examples include "proficient in languages" or "good with languages". While the intention is to convey competence, correct usage is crucial for clear communication. Therefore, avoid "at languages" in formal and informal contexts. Instead, focus on alternatives to improve clarity and grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

proficient in languages

Replaces "at" with "in" to create a grammatically correct phrase indicating skill level.

skilled in languages

Uses "skilled" instead of a generic descriptor, providing a more precise description of ability.

good with languages

Employs "with" to denote ease or talent when dealing with languages.

talented in languages

Highlights a natural aptitude or gift for languages.

adept at languages

Indicates a high degree of skill and competence in languages.

excels in languages

Expresses a superior level of performance and achievement in languages.

has a knack for languages

Suggests an inherent ease and natural ability for acquiring languages.

language ability

Focuses on the general capacity and competence in languages.

language skills

Refers to the specific abilities and knowledge related to languages.

language expertise

Emphasizes specialized knowledge and mastery in the field of languages.

FAQs

How to correctly use a preposition when describing someone's ability with languages?

Use prepositions like "in" or "with" instead of "at". For example, say "She is proficient "proficient in languages"" or "He is good "good with languages"".

What is a grammatically correct way to say someone is skilled with languages?

Instead of saying "skilled at languages", say "skilled "skilled in languages"". The preposition "in" is appropriate in this context.

What can I say instead of "at languages" to indicate language ability?

Use phrases like "language skills", "language ability", or "proficiency in languages".

Which is correct, "good at languages" or "good with languages"?

"Good with languages" is generally preferred and more grammatically sound than "good at languages". You can also say "good "proficient in languages"".