Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
as discussed by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'as discussed by' is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to introduce a quote or reference, often from a specific author or source. For example: "The importance of a healthy diet has been highlighted by experts, as discussed by Dr. Smith in her book, 'The Benefits of Nutritious Eating'."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(20)
as addressed by
in the words of
as revisited by
as reconsidered by
as noted by
as reviewed by
as examination by
as assessment by
as interviewed by
as mentioned by
it was reviewed by
according to
as analyzed by
as discriminated by
as analysed by
the reviewer noted that
as considered by
as questioned by
as stated by
as rewritten by
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
As discussed by V.O.
Encyclopedias
Take, for example, "tele-I.C.U.s" as discussed by Atul Gawande.
News & Media
As discussed by Larry Elliot, the economies of eastern Europe have been shaken by the credit crunch.
News & Media
As discussed by Wijsman [45].
Science
As discussed by J. M. Korhonen, this is significant.
News & Media
As discussed by Stavisky and Centeno [41, p. 3].
Science
The paradigmatic example of a preference aggregation rule is pairwise majority voting, as discussed by Condorcet.
Science
The nano-adsorption materials both have pros and cons, as discussed by Wang et al. [11].
Science
As discussed by Autor (2001), the direction of the effect of the internet is ambiguous.
The ordered response logistic regression formulation is presented as discussed by Long [4].
Consequently, as discussed by Ragan, words are usually augmented to improve comprehension.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "as discussed by" to introduce specific viewpoints or analyses from a cited source, ensuring clear attribution and enhancing the credibility of your writing.
Common error
Avoid framing sentences where the subject performing the action is unclear. Ensure it's evident who is doing the discussing. For example, instead of "It was discussed by," use "As discussed by [Author],"
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as discussed by" functions as a prepositional phrase used to introduce a reference or quotation from a particular source. This attribution is crucial in academic and professional writing. Ludwig AI confirms the acceptability and common usage of the phrase.
Frequent in
Science
76%
News & Media
11%
Encyclopedias
2%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "as discussed by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to attribute information or ideas to a specific source. Ludwig AI confirms this. It's particularly prevalent in scientific and academic writing, offering a formal way to acknowledge intellectual contributions. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly identify the source and accurately represent their analysis or viewpoint. While alternatives like "as mentioned by" exist, "as discussed by" implies a more thorough exploration of the topic by the cited author.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
as mentioned by
This alternative is less emphatic and simply indicates that the source made reference to the topic.
as noted by
This alternative is similar to 'as mentioned by' but suggests a slightly greater level of importance or relevance.
as analyzed by
This alternative emphasizes the source's detailed examination and interpretation of the subject.
as examined by
This alternative highlights a thorough investigation conducted by the source.
as considered by
This alternative suggests that the source gave thought or attention to the topic.
according to
This alternative provides a more general way to attribute information to a source, without necessarily implying a discussion or analysis.
according to the analysis of
This alternative is longer and more formal. It specifies that you are giving information based on someone's analysis.
in the words of
This alternative emphasizes a direct quote or specific phrasing used by the source.
referring to
This alternative indicates that the current statement is in reference to a statement by somebody else.
in the opinion of
This alternative specifies that you are giving information based on someone's opinion.
FAQs
How can I use "as discussed by" in a sentence?
Use "as discussed by" to introduce information, theories, or analyses presented by a particular person or source. For instance, "As discussed by Smith, the results indicate..."
What's the difference between "as discussed by" and "according to"?
"As discussed by" implies a more in-depth analysis or exploration by the source, while "according to" is a more general way to attribute information.
What are some alternatives to "as discussed by"?
You can use alternatives like "as mentioned by", "according to the analysis of", or "as noted by" depending on the context.
Is "as discussed by" suitable for formal writing?
Yes, "as discussed by" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in academic or professional contexts where citing sources is important. However, for more casual writing, consider less formal alternatives.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested