Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
as mentioned by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "as mentioned by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when introducing and referring to a previous comment or statement made by someone. For example: "As mentioned by the school principal, there will be an early dismissal next Thursday."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(20)
is equivalent to
in the wishes of
rapidly thereafter
for the immediate future
Very soon
somewhere later
one week before
at the early time
in the next weeks
during the previous years
it is important to remember
not yet completed
to avoid disruption
in accordance with direction from
a couple of books before
if not soon
in two days
as excellent as
in a flash
as instructed by the directive
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
As mentioned by "A.
News & Media
Chandler, Hammett and James M Cain as mentioned by JudgeDamnNation have to be big contenders.
News & Media
The use of psychometric testing to select graduates, as mentioned by Davies, is not unusual.
News & Media
In these zones, as mentioned by Barnum et al.
Science
MTT assay as mentioned by [28] was performed.
Science
As mentioned by a student, "Responsibility can motivate me more".
MTT assay as mentioned by Adhikari et al. [16] was performed for cell viability assay.
Science
In West Java, as mentioned by Wilson (2010), many NGOs felt confused and hesitant to intervene.
Methodology for G. ochropterus rearing was followed as mentioned by Varshney and Ballal (2017).
As mentioned by Su (2000), "evidence is only evidence in a local network of meanings".
The drawback of this research work is same as mentioned by Joerer et al. (2014).
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Vary your attribution phrases to avoid repetition. Use alternatives like "according to", "as noted by", or "as stated by" to keep your writing engaging.
Common error
Avoid using "as mentioned by" excessively in passive constructions. Instead, structure your sentences to highlight the source's active role, for example, "[Source Name] mentioned that..." is often stronger than "As mentioned by [Source Name], ..."
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "as mentioned by" serves as an attributive phrase, introducing information or ideas previously expressed by a specific source. Ludwig AI indicates that it's grammatically correct and widely used. The phrase clearly signals that the subsequent information is not original to the current writer, adding credibility by referencing an external authority.
Frequent in
Science
55%
News & Media
25%
Formal & Business
20%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "as mentioned by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase for attributing information to a source. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread application. It's most common in scientific, news, and formal business contexts. While effective for attribution, it's important to vary your language and avoid overuse. Consider alternatives like "according to" or "as stated by" to maintain reader engagement. Be mindful of the potential for passive voice and strive to highlight the source's active role whenever possible.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
according to
This alternative is a more concise and direct way of attributing information.
as stated by
This alternative emphasizes the formality and authority of the statement.
as reported by
This alternative is best used when referring to information found in reports or news articles.
as noted by
This alternative is suitable when referring to observations or notes made by someone.
in the words of
This alternative is used when quoting someone directly.
credited to
This alternative is best used to attribute an idea, invention, or creation to someone.
attributed to
This alternative is similar to 'credited to' but can also be used for less concrete attributions.
referencing
This alternative provides a more informal and general way to indicate source material, usually in conversation.
with reference to
This alternative is a more formal way to introduce the information.
citing
This alternative emphasizes the act of formally referencing a source, such as in academic writing.
FAQs
How can I use "as mentioned by" in a sentence?
Use "as mentioned by" to introduce information or an idea that originated from a specific person or source. For example, "As mentioned by the lead researcher, the results are preliminary."
What are some alternatives to "as mentioned by"?
You can use alternatives like "according to", "as stated by", or "as noted by" depending on the context.
Is it better to use "as mentioned by" or "according to"?
Both phrases are correct, but "according to" is often more concise and direct. Use "as mentioned by" when you want to emphasize a specific previous mention or conversation. The best choice depends on the specific context and desired emphasis.
Can I use "as mentioned by" to cite my own work?
While grammatically correct, it's generally better to say "as I mentioned" or "as noted in my previous work" to avoid sounding overly formal or distancing yourself from your own ideas.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested