are valid for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are valid for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate the applicability or acceptance of something within a certain context or timeframe. Example: "These terms and conditions are valid for all users who register before the end of the month."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Coupon books are valid for a year.

The New York Times - Travel

Tourist visas are valid for three months, and cost £50.

The Guardian - Travel

If granted they are valid for up to two years.

The Guardian - Money

Permits are valid for 14 days and may be renewed.

The New York Times

Both prices are valid for the school summer holidays.

The Guardian - Travel

Tickets are valid for evening or matinee performance.

Independent

Tickets cost €15 and are valid for 48 hours.

Independent

The $200 permits are valid for two years and can be renewed indefinitely.

The New York Times - Food

For example, debentures at the Royal Albert Hall are valid for 999 years.

The Guardian - Money

Other tickets are valid for general admission only and may not include special exhibitions.

The New York Times - Travel

Trademarks are valid for 10 years, and can be renewed for 10-year periods thereafter.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are valid for", ensure the context clearly defines what is being validated and the scope or duration of its validity. Specificity enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "are valid for" in excessively general statements without specifying the conditions or limitations. This can lead to misinterpretation and invalidate the claim.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are valid for" functions as a predicate adjective phrase, indicating the state or condition of something being acceptable or applicable within specified parameters. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

32%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are valid for" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate the acceptability, legitimacy, or applicability of something within a defined context or timeframe. Ludwig AI shows that it's grammatically sound and suitable for various writing styles. It appears frequently in scientific and news contexts, highlighting its utility in conveying specific conditions and limitations. When using "are valid for", ensure to clearly define the scope and conditions to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases like "are applicable to" or "are relevant for" can be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are applicable to

Emphasizes the relevance or suitability of something in relation to a particular situation or subject.

are relevant for

Highlights the pertinence or importance of something in a given context.

are appropriate for

Suggests that something is suitable or fitting for a particular purpose or situation.

are suitable for

Indicates that something is well-matched or fitting for a specific use or circumstance.

are good for

Implies that something is beneficial or advantageous in a certain context.

are legitimate for

Conveys that something is lawful, rightful, or in accordance with established rules or principles.

are permissible for

Indicates that something is allowed or authorized within a specific framework.

are in effect for

Highlights the active or operative period of something, such as a law or agreement.

are effective for

Emphasizes the capability of something to produce a desired result or effect in a particular situation.

are recognized for

Suggests that something is acknowledged or accepted as being valid or legitimate within a specific domain.

FAQs

How can I use "are valid for" in a sentence?

Use "are valid for" to specify the conditions, timeframe, or scope within which something is applicable or acceptable. For example, "These tickets "are valid for" evening or matinee performances".

What's the difference between "are valid for" and "are applicable to"?

"Are valid for" often implies a timeframe or specific set of conditions, while "are applicable to" suggests a general relevance or suitability. The choice depends on the intended nuance.

What can I say instead of "are valid for"?

You can use alternatives like "are relevant for", "are appropriate for", or "are suitable for" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "is valid for" instead of "are valid for"?

Use "is valid for" with singular subjects and ""are valid for"" with plural subjects. For example, "This ticket is valid for one entry" versus "These tickets "are valid for" seven days".