Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are relevant for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are relevant for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is applicable or significant in a particular context or situation. Example: "The findings of this research are relevant for understanding the impact of climate change on biodiversity."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"These plays are relevant for everybody".

News & Media

The Guardian

The same principles are relevant for other potential trade deals.

News & Media

The New York Times

"Myths and beliefs are domains of experience that are relevant for categorisation," Lakoff writes.

"I don't think these big data solutions are relevant for all businesses," he said.

Cate also covers feminism, pop culture and viral news stories that are relevant for the Social Web.

News & Media

The Guardian

Such questions "are relevant for living populations.

Science & Research

Science Magazine

are relevant for their distribution.

Their results are relevant for this research.

These conditions are relevant for mineral carbonation applications.

Such approaches are relevant for networks that are rather dense.

However, these are relevant for understanding the later stand dynamics.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are relevant for", ensure the connection between the subject and the area of relevance is clear and explicit to avoid ambiguity. Always specify what the items are relevant for.

Common error

Avoid using "are relevant for" in overly broad or general statements without specifying the context. This can weaken the impact and clarity of your writing.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are relevant for" functions as a linking phrase that establishes a relationship between two entities, indicating that the first entity holds importance or applicability to the second. Ludwig's examples confirm this function across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "are relevant for" is a versatile and grammatically sound way to indicate the applicability or importance of something in a given context. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its widespread use across academic, scientific, news, and business domains. To ensure clarity, specify the context or purpose for which something is relevant. While alternatives like "are applicable to" and "are significant for" exist, "are relevant for" maintains a neutral to formal tone suitable for various professional settings. Be mindful of overgeneralization and always provide sufficient context to maximize clarity and impact in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "are relevant for" in a sentence?

Use "are relevant for" to indicate that certain information, ideas, or actions are important or applicable to a specific situation or purpose. For example, "These findings "are relevant for" policy makers." Ensure the connection is clear.

What phrases can I use instead of "are relevant for"?

You can use alternatives like "are applicable to", "are significant for", or "are pertinent to" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "are relevant to" or "are relevant for"?

While both "are relevant to" and "are relevant for" can be grammatically correct, ""are relevant for"" is often used when discussing purpose or benefit, whereas "are relevant to" indicates a general relationship or connection.

What's the difference between "are important for" and "are relevant for"?

"Are important for" indicates something is crucial or vital for a specific outcome, while ""are relevant for"" indicates something is applicable and connected to a specific context. Importance implies a higher degree of necessity than relevance.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: