Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

are symptomatic of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "are symptomatic of" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something is a sign or indication of a particular condition or situation. Example: "The rising unemployment rates are symptomatic of deeper economic issues that need to be addressed."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Euphemisms are symptomatic of shame".

It's what they are symptomatic of.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Beds are symptomatic of a problem".

News & Media

The Guardian

They are symptomatic of a larger cultural issue.

News & Media

The New York Times

These verbal attacks are symptomatic of his authoritarian tendencies.

News & Media

The Guardian

They are symptomatic of a deep failure of politics.

News & Media

The New York Times

Both are symptomatic of our culture's deep investment in minimising and normalising sexual assault.

Mr. Pickens's struggles are symptomatic of a broader reversal of fortune for wind developers.

News & Media

The New York Times

And they are symptomatic of an economy that is out of sorts.

The problems at the Maracanã are symptomatic of wider concerns about Brazil's World Cup preparations.

Sadly, these gaffes are symptomatic of Maguire's often shaky grasp of details.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "are symptomatic of", ensure the connection between the symptom and the underlying issue is clear to the reader. Provide context to support the relationship.

Common error

Avoid using "are symptomatic of" when the connection is weak or speculative. Overstating the connection can weaken your argument and mislead the reader.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are symptomatic of" functions as a linking verb phrase that connects a subject to a predicate adjective or noun phrase indicating that the subject serves as a sign or indication of something else. This usage is confirmed by Ludwig AI which validates the phrase's grammatical correctness and typical usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

88%

Science

10%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "are symptomatic of" is a versatile expression used to indicate that certain observable issues point towards a deeper, underlying condition. As validated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and frequently used in various contexts, particularly within news and media. While alternatives like "are indicative of" and "are reflective of" exist, "are symptomatic of" often carries a connotation of an underlying problem. Therefore, it's crucial to ensure the connection between the symptom and the underlying issue is clear to the reader. Remember to avoid overstating the significance when the connection is weak or speculative.

FAQs

How to use "are symptomatic of" in a sentence?

Use "are symptomatic of" to indicate that certain observable issues are indicative of a deeper, underlying problem. For example, "The increasing number of customer complaints "are symptomatic of" a decline in product quality".

What can I say instead of "are symptomatic of"?

You can use alternatives like "are indicative of", "are reflective of", or "are representative of" depending on the context.

What is the difference between "are symptomatic of" and "are indicative of"?

"Are symptomatic of" often implies a problem or negative condition, whereas "are indicative of" is more neutral and simply suggests something is a sign or indication. Both phrases can be used interchangeably but be mindful of the connotation.

Can "are symptomatic of" be used for positive situations?

While "are symptomatic of" is typically used for negative situations, it's possible to use it in a positive context if the underlying condition is seen as desirable. For example, "The high employee retention rates "are symptomatic of" a positive work environment".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: